. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Apr;87(4):357–369. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000384

Table 4.

Pearson correlations among fidelity-consistent modifications, adherence ratings, and competence ratings

	Fidelity-Consistent Modifications	Adherence	Competence
Fidelity-Consistent Modifications	1.00	T1: 0.13, p = .324	T1: 0.54, p < .001
		T2: −0.17, p = .322	T2: 0.67, p < .001
		T3: −0.32, p = .163	T3: 0.67, p < .001

Adherence	−0.13, p = .350	1.00	T1: −0.09, p = .509
			T2: −0.22, p = .201
			T3: −0.22, p = .354

Competence	0.52, p < .001	0.09, p = .485	1.00

Note. T1 = time 1 (baseline to session 4). T2 = time 2 (sessions 5 – 8). T3 = time 3 (session 9 – 12). Values below the diagonal represent correlations between constructs representing the average across all sessions attended. Values above the diagonal are correlations of constructs within the same time period.