Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jan 25;153(1):127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.015

Table 1.

Univariate analysis of response with clinical parameters and H-scores

Non-Responder (N=29) Responder (N=7) p value
HR Status 0.0081
 Deficient 11 (37.9%) 7 (100%)
  BRCA1/2 Mutant 9 6*
 HR-proficient 18 (62.1%) 0 (0%)
53BP1 H-score 0.122
 median 90 140
 Q1, Q3 70, 110 80, 180
Ku80 H-score 0.132
 median 10 40
 Q1, Q3 0, 40 25, 65
Ku70 H-score 0.192
 median 0 10
 Q1, Q3 0, 10 5, 30
PARP1 H-score 0.242
 median 60 110
 Q1, Q3 25, 105 70, 115
XRCC4 H-score 0.292
 median 30 5
 Q1, Q3 7.5, 50 0, 30
DNA-PKCS H-score 0.432
 median 20 50
 Q1, Q3 5, 55 20, 60
RAD51 H-score 0.972
 median 15 20
 Q1, Q3 5, 40 7.5, 25
*

The 7th patient responded had an ovarian cancer harboring a RAD51C promoter methylation

1

Fisher’s exact test

2

Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test