Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 17;26(2):471–482. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-0993-x

Table 3.

Correlation between subacute PET and follow-up CMR

Correlation coefficient (r)
CMR follow-up (N = 35)
Variables LVEF (%) LVEDV (mL) LVESV (mL) FIS (% of LV)
Extent of severe hypoperfusion (%) −0.53** 0.31 0.48** 0.58***
Global blood flow (ml·min·g) 0.41* −0.22 −0.42* −0.32

Correlations between PET derivatives and CMR follow-up outcomes on a patient basis

CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; LVEF left ventricle ejection fraction; LVEDV left ventricle end-diastolic volume; LVESV left ventricle end-systolic volume; FIS final infarct size; PET, positron emission tomography

P < .05

** P < .01

*** P < .001