Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 17;26(2):471–482. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-0993-x

Table 5.

Linear mixed models for CMR derivatives explained by EF at discharge, peak TNT and CK-MB

Outcome CMR follow-up (N = 560 segments)
Wall thickening (% AHA-16 segments) Wall motion (mm AHA-16 segments) LGE (% transmurality per AHA-16 segments)
β P R 2 β P R 2 β P R 2
EF at discharge by Echo 0.99 [.38; 1.60] .002 0.07 0.08 [.02; .13] .008 0.002 −0.73 [−1.03; −.44] .001 0.09
Peak TNT −0.002 [−.003; −.001] .001 0.07 −0.0002 [−.0003; −.00006] .003 0.04 0.0013 [.0007; .002] .001 0.06
Peak CK-MB −0.06 [−.09; −.03] .001 0.08 −0.005 [−.008; −.002] .001 0.05 0.04 [.03; .06] .001 0.12

Mixed-model regression analyses for routine tests readily available at cardiac units of CMR-derived wall thickening, wall motion, and LGE transmurality per AHA-16 segments

EF, ejection fraction; Echo, echocardiography; TNT troponin T; CK-MB creatine-kinase MB; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; AHA-16, American Heart Association 16-segment model