Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 22;14:70. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1001-0

Table 2.

Age-stratified unadjusted relative (rate ratio) and absolute (rate difference) comparisons of rates of health services encounters in MCAD deficiency cohort versus screen negative cohort

Outcome and age group Incidence rate ratio (IRR), MCAD deficiency cohort vs. screen negative cohort (95% CI) Incidence rate difference (IRD), MCAD deficiency cohort vs. screen negative cohort, per child per year (95% CI)
Physician encounters
  < 6 months 1.2 (1.1, 1.3) 4.2 (2.1, 6.4)
 6 to < 12 months 1.6 (1.4, 1.8) 5.8 (4.1, 7.5)
 12 to < 18 months 1.3 (1.1, 1.5) 2.9 (1.3, 4.5)
 18 to < 24 months 1.7 (1.5, 1.9) 5.0 (3.4, 6.6)
 2 to < 3 years 1.4 (1.2, 1.5) 2.0 (1.1, 2.9)
 3 to < 4 years 1.5 (1.3, 1.7) 2.4 (1.3, 3.4)
  ≥ 4 years 1.5 (1.3, 1.7) 2.5 (1.4, 3.6)
Emergency department visits
  < 6 months 1.9 (1.3, 2.7) 0.7 (0.2, 1.2)
 6 to < 12 months 3.1 (2.4, 4.1) 1.7 (1.0, 2.4)
 12 to < 18 months 2.6 (2.0, 3.5) 1.4 (0.8, 2.1)
 18 to < 24 months 2.7 (2.0, 3.7) 1.3 (0.7, 2.0)
 2 to < 3 years 2.1 (1.6, 2.9) 0.7 (0.3, 1.1)
 3 to < 4 years 2.0 (1.4, 3.0) 0.5 (0.1, 0.9)
  ≥ 4 years 1.7 (1.1, 2.6) 0.3 (−0.03, 0.7)a
Inpatient hospitalizations
  < 6 months 1.6 (0.8, 3.5)a 0.1 (− 0.1, 0.4)a
 6 to < 12 months 10.8 (6.1, 18.9) 0.5 (0.2, 0.9)
 12 to < 24 months 9.6 (6.1, 15.0) 0.4 (0.2, 0.6)
 2 to < 3 years 10.8 (6.3, 18.7) 0.3 (0.1, 0.5)
  ≥ 3 years 15.2 (9.7, 23.8) 0.4 (0.2, 0.5)

aDifference not statistically significant, p > 0.05; all other rates were statistically significantly different between the two cohorts