Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 22;19:33. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0355-6

Table 3.

Comparison of endocrinopathy in different series

Characteristics Nakanishi et al.[15], N = 102 (1984)
No.(%)of patients
Soubrier et al.,[18] N = 25 (1994)
No.(%)of patients
Dispenzieri et al.,[1] N = 99 (2002)
No.(%)of patients
Gandhi et al.,[4] N = 64 (2007)
No.(%)of patients
Hu et al. [19], N = 23 (2017)
No.(%)of patients
Any endocrine abnormality NR NR 66/99(66) 54/64(84) 22/23(96)
Adrenal axis abnormality NR NR 16/35(46) 6/9(67) 10/17(59)
Hyperprolactinemia NR 4/17(24) 5/25(20) 10/35(29) 9/15(60)
Diabetes mellitus or glucose intolerance 26/93(28) 9/22(41) 3/99(3) 24/50(48) 5/23(22)
Hypothyroidism 5/21(24) 10/22(45) 26/99(26) 28/48(58) 13/22(59)
Hypocalcemia NR NR 1/4(25) 14/51(27) 3/10(30)
Gonad related dysfunction Hypogonadism NR 9/19(47) 55/99(55) 26/33(79) 7/18(39)
Erectile dysfunction (males) 39/50(78) 13/13(100) 44/63(71) 23/38(61) NR
Gynecomastia or galactorrhea (males) 43/63(68) 10/13(77) 17/63(27) 10/38(26) NR
Multiple endocrine abnormalities NR NR NR 29/54(54) NR

*Data are number (percentage) of patients, NR = not reported