Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 8;116(12):5262–5269. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802870115

Table 1.

CBAs of water quality programs

Regulation Study time frame Benefit-to-cost ratio Benefits, per year Costs, per year
CWA
 Freeman (6) 1985 0.19–1.23 $13.6B to $65.9B $53.7B to $71.6B
 Carson and Mitchell (7) 1990s 0.61–1.25 $98.1B $78.3B to $160.2B
 Lyon and Farrow (8) 1990s 0.25–1.16 $10.9B to $22.0B $18.9B to $43.7B
 US EPA (21, 61) 1990s 0.79–0.88 $18.9B $21.5B to $24.0B
 Keiser and Shapiro (1) 1962–2001 0.24 $3.9B $16.3B
WOTUS
 Obama Administration 2015 1.10–2.41 $0.3B to $0.6B $0.2B to $0.5B
 Trump Administration 2017 0.11–0.30 $0.03B to $0.07B $0.2B to $0.5B
CRP
 Hansen (47) 2000s 0.76–0.87 $2.1B $2.4B to $2.7B
Effluent Guidelines
 Centralized Waste Treatment 2000 0.07–0.23 $4M to $14M $60M
 Landfills 2000 0.00 <$0.1M $13M
 Transportation Equipment Cleaning 2000 0.11–0.33 $3M to $9M $27M
 Waste Combustors 2000 0.15–0.5 $0.3M to $1M $2M
 Coal Mining 2002 >1 $22M to $24M $0M
 Iron and Steel Manufacturing 2002 0.11–0.58 $2M to $11M $19M
 Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations 2003 0.61–1.06 $320M to $557M $526M
 Metal Products and Machinery 2003 0.09 $2M $22M
 Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production 2004 0.05 $0.1M $2M
 Meat and Poultry Products 2004 0.05 $4M $86M
 Construction and Development 2009 0.39 $429M $1,108M
 Steam Electric 2015 0.94–1.18 $464M to $582M $493M

The study time frame describes the time period for which benefits and costs were estimated for the CWA and CRP estimates. For the WOTUS, the initial rule was released in 2015 during the Obama Administration. The Trump Administration calculations reflect a 2017 proposed recodification of existing rules. For effluent guidelines, the time period indicates the year that the rule was released. Freeman (6) estimates benefits in 1985 of removing conventional water pollutants. Corresponding costs are estimates of annual control costs in 1985 based on the Council of Environmental Quality’s estimate of water pollution control costs in 1978. Carson and Mitchell (7) estimate the benefits and costs of moving water quality from a national baseline of nonboatable to swimmable water. Cost estimates range from Department of Commerce’s estimates of $78.3B in 1988 expenditures to projected expenditures of $160.2B in the year 2000. Lyon and Farrow (8) estimate benefits of a one-step ($10.9B) or two-step ($22B) improvement in the water quality ladder. Cost estimates reflect various control options considered by the authors. US EPA (21) estimates in-place annual benefits due to the CWA in the mid-1990s. Corresponding cost estimates from US EPA (61) are incremental costs of controlling water pollution due to the CWA for 1994 ($21.5B) and 1997 ($24B). Keiser and Shapiro (1) estimate the benefits and costs of the CWA’s municipal grants program. The $16.3B in costs per year reflect total of $650B in costs spread over 40 y. Benefits reflect the increase in housing values due to the grants program (0.24*$16.3B, where 0.24 comes from the last column of table 6 in Keiser and Shapiro). Costs and benefits for WOTUS taken from the 2015 rule and 2017 proposed rule published in the Federal Register. Reported benefit-to-cost ratios for WOTUS reflect two individual scenarios considered by the rule, while cost and benefit ranges reflect the lower and upper bounds of these scenarios. Costs and benefits for effluent rules taken from finalized rules published in the Federal Register. All dollars have been deflated to 2014 dollars using the Engineering News Record 2014 Construction Price Index. Abbreviations: B, billion; M, million.