Table 1.

Basic Genome and Secondary Metabolite Cluster Statistics for the Three WGD Species in Comparison to Selected Other Dothideomycetes

Dothideomycete Species	Estimated Genome Size (Mb)a	Assembled Genome Size (Mb)b	Number of Predicted Proteins	CEGMAc Score	References
Botryopshaeriaceae
Eutiarosporella tritici-australis	26.6	27.1	8571	96.77	This work
Eutiarosporella darliae	27.9	27.8	8735	97.18	This work
Eutiarosporella pseudodarliae	28.0	27.3	8678	97.58	This work
Macrophomina phaseolina		49.3	14249	98.79	Islam et al. (2012)
Botryosphaeria dothidea		34	14998	N/A	Marsberg et al. (2017)
Neofusicoccum parvum		43.7	13124	97.2	Blanco-Ulate et al. (2013)
Diplodia seriata		37.1	9398	96	Morales-Cruz et al. (2015)
Mycosphaerellaceae
Zymoseptoria tritici		39.7	10933	N/A	Goodwin et al. (2011)
Mycosphaerella populicola		33.2	9739	94.4	Dhillon et al. (2015)
Mycosphaerella populorum		29.3	10233	96	Dhillon et al. (2015)
Predicted secondary metabolite clusters
	Polyketide synthase (PKS)	Non ribosomal peptide synthase (NRPS)	Hybrid PKS/NRPS	Terpene synthase
Eutiarosporella tritici-australis	4	3	0	7
Eutiarosporella darliae	5	5	1	7
Eutiarosporella pseudodarliae	5	6	1	7
Macrophomina phaseolina	35	28	12	N/A	Islam et al. (2012)

^aGenome size estimated from quality trimmed, unassembled Illumina reads with a kmer size of 31.

^bSum of the total length of bases assembled into contigs.

^cCore Eukaryotic Gene Mapping Approach (CEGMA), used to estimate genome assembly completeness by identifying conserved genes in the assembled contigs.