Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Dec 1;29(6):674–679. doi: 10.3171/2018.4.SPINE171389

Thoracogenic Spinal Deformity: A Rare Cause of Early Onset Scoliosis

Sarah F Eby 1, Tricia St Hilaire 2, Michael Glotzbecker 3, John Smith 4, Klane White 5; Children’s Spine Study Group, A Noelle Larson 6
PMCID: PMC6431290  NIHMSID: NIHMS1012207  PMID: 30192221

Abstract

Object:

Surgery for severe congenital defects such as congenital diaphragmatic hernia, congenital heart defects, and tracheoesophageal disorders are life-saving treatments for many infants. However, the incidence of scoliosis following thoracoabdominal surgery ranges from 8­50%. There is little known about severe scoliosis acquired following surgery in infancy. We sought to evaluate patients who developed severe scoliosis following surgical treatment of congenital conditions.

Methods:

A multicenter database of patients with early onset scoliosis was queried to identify patients with a history of thoracogenic or acquired scoliosis. Patients with significant congenital spine deformities were excluded. 41 patients (1.6%) were noted to have thoracogenic scoliosis. Of those, 14 were observed, 10 were casted or braced, 17 underwent treatment with rib-based distraction rods, Shilla, or spine-based growing rod devices. Radiographs, complications, and patient characteristics were reviewed.

Results:

Mean age at scoliosis diagnosis for the 41 patients was 6.0 years. Mean time to follow-up was 2.9 years. Mean preoperative coronal Cobb angle in the surgical group was 65° and improved to 47° postoperatively (p=0.01). Mean Cobb angle for the non-operative group was 31° initially and 32° at follow-up (p=0.44). Among the 17 patients undergoing surgery for scoliosis, there were 13 complications in 7 patients, including a brachial plexus palsy following rib-based distraction rod placement. This resolved with revision of the rib hooks. There were no known complications in the non-operative cohort.

Conclusions:

Severe scoliosis can develop following thoracotomy and other pediatric surgical procedures. Work is needed to understand the pathogenesis of scoliosis in this population so as to implement preventative measures.

Level of Evidence:

IV, retrospective review of prospectively collected data

Keywords: acquired scoliosis, early onset scoliosis, diaphragmatic hernia, thoracotomy, scoliosis, thoracotomy, laminectomy, sternotomy, thoracic wall resection, early onset, infantile, VEPTR

INTRODUCTION

Surgery for severe congenital defects such as congenital diaphragmatic hernia, congenital heart defects, and tracheoesophageal disorders are life-saving treatments for many infants. Though dwarfed by the obvious benefits and necessity of intervention, the development of severe scoliosis may be an undesirable consequence of thoracoabdominal surgery. Scoliosis affects 2% to 4% of the general pediatric population7,17 but is much more prevalent in children following thoracoabdominal surgical intervention. Scoliosis is reported in 13% to 33% of children surviving congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair6,13,16, 8.5% of children following cardiac surgery11, and as many as 50% of children following tracheoesophageal fistula repair3. Severe scoliosis is also noted to occur following chest wall resection, and is often progressive5,8.

Early onset scoliosis can range in severity and may result from a number of etiologies, most of which are poorly understood, though some do appear to be mechanical in nature10,14. Patient age, underlying diagnoses, and curve characteristics all play a role in evaluating treatment strategies, which may include observation, bracing/casting, or surgical interventions for more significant curves. Vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR®, DePuy Synthes, West Chester, PA, USA) and growth rods can be helpful interventions for severe curves in young children, though may worsen chest wall compliance and have high rates of complications1. Improved understanding of the development and progression of severe scoliosis following thoracoabdominal surgery is necessary to help providers, patients, and families navigate treatment options and expectations.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and characterize patients with severe thoracogenic scoliosis from a large multi-center database of children with early onset scoliosis, or disease onset prior to 10 years of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We queried a multicenter database that prospectively enrolls and follows patients with early onset scoliosis. Twenty-five medical centers across the United States participate; and 2555 patients were prospectively enrolled in the registry from 2002 to 2014. Institutional review board approval was obtained at each site, and informed consent was obtained from all study participants/parents. We queried the database to identify patients with a history of thoracogenic or acquired scoliosis. Patients with congenital spine deformities were excluded from the current study.

We identified 43 patients (1.7%) with thoracogenic scoliosis. Two surgical patients (one VEPTR®, one indeterminate) had inadequate data available and were excluded. We reviewed radiographs, complications, and patient characteristics for 41 patients. Of those, 14 were observed, 10 were casted or braced, and 17 were treated surgically. Fifteen patients underwent treatment with VEPTR® devices, one underwent a Shilla procedure, and another had growing rods implanted. Six patients from the non-operative group and two from the operative group had no follow-up Cobb angles, but were included in the analysis.

Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson chi-square test for nominal variables and the two-tailed student’s t-test for continuous variables. Matched pairs analysis was used to assess for change between pre- and post-operative values in the same patient. Observed differences that have a less than 5 per cent likelihood of occurring by chance were considered significant.

RESULTS

Mean age at presentation for the 41 patients was 6.0 years. Mean time to follow-up was 2.9 years (Table 1). Etiology for the scoliosis was heterogeneous. Diagnoses were similar among the operative and the nonoperative groups. Nineteen patients had had a previous thoracotomy, 4 had sternotomies, and 6 had chest wall resections for tumor. Three subjects in the operative group and four subjects in the nonoperative group had limited available data regarding the type of previous chest wall surgery. Four of these patients had congenital diaphragmatic hernia, one had congenital heart defect, one had tracheoesophageal fistula, and the final patient had leukemia treated with radiation.

Table 1.

Characteristics of surgical group. Age and follow-up given in years. Group means provided as mean (standard deviation).

Age at treatment (Yrs.) Sex Diagnosis / associated interventions Intervention Cobb angle (°) Curve levels Follow-up (Yrs.) Follow-up Cobb angle (°)
1 1.4 M Chest wall resection VEPTR 30 T1–T6 4.6 52
2 2.4 M Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; thoracotomy VEPTR 53 T7–L1 1.7 63
3 2.5 F Spinal cord tumor; laminectomy VEPTR 72 T5–T11 5.3 55
4 2.5 F Congenital heart defect, pulmonary hypoplasia; thoracotomy VEPTR 97 T4–T10 0
5 3.2 F Congenital heart defect VEPTR 86 T7–L2 8.5 34
6 3.3 M Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; pulmonary hypoplasia VEPTR 81 T6–T13 4.7 71
7 3.8 M Chest wall resection VEPTR 62 T4–L1 7.2 50
8 4.7 F Congenital heart defect; thoracotomy VEPTR 76 T6–L1 1.6 68
9 4.8 F Spinal cord tumor; laminectomy VEPTR 56 T9–L4 12.3 58
10 7.6 F Congenital heart defect; thoracotomy VEPTR 57 T3–T10 4.5 46
11 7.7 M Chest wall resection; thoracotomy VEPTR 29 T2–T9 1.3 13
12 9.1 F Nemaline myopathy; pneumonectomy; thoracotomy Growing rod 95 T12–L5
13 9.3 F Congenital heart defect / Trisomy 21; sternotomy Shilla 53 T7–T12 0.6 28
14 9.5 F Congenital heart defect; thoracotomy VEPTR 83 T6–T12 2.4 56
15 9.8 F Esophageal atresia; thoracotomy VEPTR 62 T4–T10 6.1 44
16 13.2 M Tracheoesophageal fistula VEPTR 72 T10-L3 2.6 49
17 17.9 F Tracheoesophageal fistula; thoracotomy VEPTR 33 T3–T10 9 22
MEAN 6.6 (4.3) 65 (21) 4.5 (3.3) 47 (16)

In the nonoperative group, mean age at presentation for the 24 patients was 5.4 years (Table 2). Mean Cobb angle for the non-operative group was 31° initially and 32° at follow-up (p = 0.44). Curves in the non-operative group progressed at least 10° in four patients, and improved at least 10° in another four patients. Of the curves that progressed, two had spinal cord tumors (laminectomies at L1–L2 and T11-L2), one had congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair involving a left thoracotomy, and one had radiation treatment for leukemia. Ten patients had initial curves greater than 30°; one of these had improved to less than 30° by follow-up, while an additional two progressed to greater than 30°.

Table 2.

Characteristics of non-operative group. Age and follow-up given in years. Group means provided as mean (standard deviation).

Age at index (Yrs.) Sex Diagnosis / associated intervention Intervention Cobb angle (°) Curve levels Follow-up (Yrs.) Follow-up Cobb Angle (°) Follow-up curve levels
1 0.5 M Congenital diaphragmatic hernia Observed 23 T7–L3
2 0.9 F Congenital diaphragmatic hernia Cast 26 T3–T9 2.8 24 T5–T9
3 1.1 F Congenital heart defect; sternotomy, laminectomy Observed 29 T2–T6 0.6 36 T1–T6
4 1.4 F Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; thoracotomy Cast 34 T1–T10 2.1 48 T1–T10
5 2.1 F Chest wall resection Observed 37 T4–T10 2.3 41 T4–T10
6 2.3 M Spinal cord tumor; laminectomy Cast (then brace) 41 T3–T10 1.8 43 T2–T10
7 2.6 M Tracheoesophageal fistula; thoracotomy Cast (then brace) 56 T7–L2 1.8 34 T7–T12
8 3.1 F Spinal cord tumor; laminectomy Brace 16 T2–T11 9.2 8 T3–T6
9 3.3 M Congenital heart defect / Trisomy 21; thoracotomy Cast 40 T9–L2 0.7 30 T9–L2
10 3.6 M Congenital heart defect; sternotomy Observed 7 T3–L3 0.5 4 T12–L5
11 4.1 M Chest wall resection Observed 35 T5–T11 0.0
12 5.1 F Congenital diaphragmatic hernia Cast (then brace) 90 T5–L5 1.5 65 T6–L4
13 5.2 M Congenital heart defect; thoracotomy Observed 13 T3–T6 0.0
14 6.1 F Congenital heart defect; thoracotomy Brace 47 T12–L4 0.8 41 T12–L4
15 6.5 F Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; thoracotomy Observed 21 L1–L5 0.0
16 6.8 M Chest wall resection Observed 15 T3–T7 0.0
17 6.9 M Congenital heart defect; sternotomy Brace 26 T6–T11 1.7 27 T6–T11
18 7.8 M Spinal cord tumor; laminectomy Observed 18 T3–L1 2.3 10 T3–T9
19 8.0 M Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; thoracotomy Observed 20 T1–T9 0.0
20 8.6 M Neuroblastoma; thoracotomy, laminectomy Observed 32 T7–T11 2.7 26 T6–T11
21 10.0 M Spinal cord tumor; laminectomy Brace 8.6 20 T11–L3
22 10.2 M Spinal cord tumor; laminectomy Observed 21 T3–T6 3.2 32 T3–T9
23 10.8 F Leukemia; radiation Observed 47 T4–T12 2.0 63 T3–T12
24 11.4 M Pulmonary hypoplasia; thoracotomy Observed 22 T4–T7 1.8 21 T3–T7
MEAN 5.4 (3.2) 31 (17) 2.0 (2.3) 32 (16)

For the 17 patients in the operative group, mean age at scoliosis surgery was 6.6 years with a mean 4.5 years of follow-up. Mean preoperative coronal Cobb angle in the surgical group was 65° and improved to 49° postoperatively (p = 0.02, Figure 1). Fifteen of the seventeen patients in the operative group had initial curves greater than 30°. Mean Cobb angle at presentation was greater in the operative group compared to the nonoperative group (65° vs. 31°, p<0.001).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

A) Preoperative images, demonstrating left-sided rib resection and 62° curve (patient 7); B) Postoperative images, obtained following VEPTR® placement, demonstrating 24° curve.

Among the 17 surgical patients, there were 13 complications in 7 patients, including pneumonia (5), brachial plexus palsy (1), spine infection (3), device migration (1), implant failure (3 times in one patient). Three pneumonias required hospitalization, and two were treated on an outpatient basis. All infections and device problems required revision surgery. The most serious perioperative complication was in a patient with previous chest wall tumor resection who developed a brachial plexus palsy following VEPTR® placement. This resolved with revision of the rib hooks. Among the nonoperative patients, one patient died and another patient had cast problems requiring trimming of the cast in clinic.

DISCUSSION

The development of scoliosis following rib resection has been well-documented8,5,10 and is often employed in experimental models2,9,10. Severe scoliosis has also been identified following thoracotomy and other pediatric surgical procedures, but is less well understood3,5,12,15 The present study characterizes the underlying diagnoses in a cohort of children with thoracogenic scoliosis from a large registry of patients with early onset scoliosis.

The exact timeline and pathophysiology for development of scoliosis following thoracotomy or similar procedures remains unclear. Despite the increased incidence and significant burden to patients and their families, there is little known about severe scoliosis acquired following surgery in infancy. Van Biezen and colleagues evaluated 160 patients undergoing thoracotomy for aortic coarctation and noted the development of scoliosis in 22% of patients, despite the absence of scoliosis prior to surgery15. Additional data may be helpful for surgeons as they counsel families about possible long-term sequelae of chest wall surgery performed at a young age. If children most at risk for scoliosis could be identified, screening measures could be put in place to ensure early access to nonoperative scoliosis treatment.

Further, it is uncertain whether thoracogenic scoliosis is due solely to an underlying diagnosis, such as a unifying defect in development resulting in both congenital diaphragmatic hernia and scoliosis, for example, or due to surgical interventions for the underlying diagnosis. Spinal cord tumor or chest wall tumor can result in scoliosis, and it is unclear whether the tumor or the surgical intervention causes the scoliosis. These patients were included in the study nevertheless, since they fall in the category of iatrogenic or thoracogenic scoliosis, or scoliosis which develops after a medical intervention. Russell et al. evaluated a number of patients undergoing congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair using a variety of surgical techniques and found no significant influence of repair technique on subsequent development of scoliosis13. Glotzbecker et al. reported severe curves (mean 26°, maximum 70°) following childhood resection of chest wall tumors, with tumor resection above the 6th rib at increased risk for developing scoliosis5. This illustrates the need for further investigation and understanding of the mechanisms and pathogenesis of scoliosis development.

This study has a number of limitations. Though data was collected prospectively, limited information regarding the index chest wall surgery was available for analysis, especially for the non-operative group. Some centers only enroll surgical patients, so potentially some nonoperative patients with thoracogenic scoliosis were not entered in the database. Curve location was well characterized, but laterality of the thoracotomy or surgical intervention was not reliably reported, nor was direction of the curve. Additionally, the lack of a control group limits interpretation in the context of managing patient expectations and outcomes with regard to incidence of scoliosis as a result of the described procedures. In some instances, patients had more than one diagnosis, such as a syndrome, congenital heart disease, and a thoracotomy. Syndromic or neuromuscular diagnoses such as myopathy, Down syndrome, as well as spinal cord tumors may contribute to scoliosis progression. Treatment strategies may vary by center. For instance, some institutions may not offer casting for early onset scoliosis or prefer surgical techniques over casting4. Follow-up was limited to what was available within the multicenter registry.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite these limitations, this study does provide significant information regarding underlying diagnoses, as well as the development and progression of thoracogenic scoliosis. Based on the patients in our registry, thoracogenic scoliosis represents a very small proportion of patients with early onset scoliosis. Nevertheless, the resultant disease can be severe, requiring childhood surgical management. In this series, patients with severe early onset scoliosis were successfully treated with rib-based growing devices. Prospective studies may illuminate what surgical characteristics are associated with the development of scoliosis following early treatments in childhood. This project may raise awareness of the association between severe scoliosis and childhood chest wall procedures and stimulate further prospective research efforts.

FUNDING:

SFE was supported by an NIH grant from the National Institute on Aging (F30 AG044075). ANL was supported by an NIH from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. (R03 AR 66342)

Footnotes

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

Institutional review board approval was obtained at each site for all aspects of this study. Informed consent was obtained from all study participants or their legal guardians. Conflicts of interests are as outlined on the title page of this manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Children’s Spine Study Group received grants from DePuy Synthes. A. Noelle Larson received research grants from Orthopedic Research and Education Foundation and Scoliosis Research Society, serves as a consultant for K2M and has received an honorarium from Orthopediatrics. Tricia St. Hilaire’s institution received funding from DePuy Synthes. Klane White serves as a consultant for Biomarin, receives Honoraria and travel support from Genzyme, and royalties from UptoDate.com. Michael Glotzbecker serves as a consultant for Medtronic and served on speakers’ bureau for Depuy Synthes.

Conflict of Interest: Sarah Eby has no conflicts to report.

This work has not been previously presented or published.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Akbarnia BA, Emans JB: Complications of growth-sparing surgery in early onset scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:2193–2204, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Deguchi M, Kawakami N, Kanemura T, Mimatsu K, Iwata H: Experimental scoliosis induced by rib resection in chickens. J Spinal Disord 8:179–185, 1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Durning RP, Scoles PV, Fox OD: Scoliosis after thoracotomy in tracheoesophageal fistula patients. A follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:1156–1159, 1980 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fletcher ND, Larson AN, Richards BS, Johnston CE: Current treatment preferences for early onset scoliosis: a survey of POSNA members. J Pediatr Orthop 31:326–330, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Glotzbecker MP, Gold M, Puder M, Hresko MT: Scoliosis after chest wall resection. J Child Orthop 7:301–307, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jancelewicz T, Vu LT, Keller RL, Bratton B, Lee H, Farmer D, et al. : Long-term surgical outcomes in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: observations from a single institution. J Pediatr Surg 45:155–160; discussion 160, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kapoor M, Laham SG, Sawyer JR: Children at risk identified in an urban scoliosis school screening program: a new model. J Pediatr Orthop B 17:281–287, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kawakami N, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F: Scoliosis secondary to rib resection. J Spinal Disord 7:522–527, 1994 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Langenskiold A, Michelsson JE: The pathogenesis of experimental progressive scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 59:1–26, 1962 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pal GP, Bhatt RH, Patel VS: Mechanism of production of experimental scoliosis in rabbits. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:137–142, 1991 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Reckles LN, Peterson HA, Weidman WH, Bianco AJ, Jr.: The association of scoliosis and congenital heart defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57:449–455, 1975 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ruiz-Iban MA, Burgos J, Aguado HJ, Diaz-Heredia J, Roger I, Muriel A, et al. : Scoliosis after median sternotomy in children with congenital heart disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:E214–218, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Russell KW, Barnhart DC, Rollins MD, Hedlund G, Scaife ER: Musculoskeletal deformities following repair of large congenital diaphragmatic hernias. J Pediatr Surg 49:886–889, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stokes IA: Analysis and simulation of progressive adolescent scoliosis by biomechanical growth modulation. Eur Spine J 16:1621–1628, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Van Biezen FC, Bakx PA, De Villeneuve VH, Hop WC: Scoliosis in children after thoracotomy for aortic coarctation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:514–518, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vanamo K, Peltonen J, Rintala R, Lindahl H, Jaaskelainen J, Louhimo I: Chest wall and spinal deformities in adults with congenital diaphragmatic defects. J Pediatr Surg 31:851–854, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wong HK, Hui JH, Rajan U, Chia HP: Idiopathic scoliosis in Singapore schoolchildren: a prevalence study 15 years into the screening program. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1188–1196, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES