Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 17;9(1):109–117. doi: 10.1007/s13534-018-0086-z

Table 2.

Performance comparison of the proposed LFS method with other methods

Method Overlap score
Proposed method 94.50% (Acc: 98.12%, specificity: 98.19%, sensitivity: 97.90%)
SIFT + Graph cut [5] 94.40%
Hybrid ASM-PC [19] 93.40%
ASM optimal feature [20] 92.70%
ASM-SIFT [16] 92.00%
ASM-tuned [19] 90.30%
ASM [19] 87.00%
Ahmad et al. [21] 87.00%
AAM [19] 84.70%
Mean shape [19] 71.30%