Table 2.
Performance comparison of the proposed LFS method with other methods
| Method | Overlap score |
|---|---|
| Proposed method | 94.50% (Acc: 98.12%, specificity: 98.19%, sensitivity: 97.90%) |
| SIFT + Graph cut [5] | 94.40% |
| Hybrid ASM-PC [19] | 93.40% |
| ASM optimal feature [20] | 92.70% |
| ASM-SIFT [16] | 92.00% |
| ASM-tuned [19] | 90.30% |
| ASM [19] | 87.00% |
| Ahmad et al. [21] | 87.00% |
| AAM [19] | 84.70% |
| Mean shape [19] | 71.30% |