Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 6.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2018 Mar 16;20(7):2011–2014. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b00558

Table 1.

Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa

graphic file with name nihms966568u2.jpg
entry substrate conditionsa ratio of 1:2:3b yield of 3 (%)c
1 1·HBF4 m-CPBA, CH2Cl2, rt 1:5:0
2 1·HBF4 H2O2, AcOH, 80 °C 0:1:0
3 1·HBF4 DMDO, CH2Cl2, rt 11:0:1
4 1·HBF4 H2O2, 4 (20 mol %) 1:0:5 77%
5 1 HBF4·OEt2, H2O2, 4 (20 mol %) 1:0:4 77%
6 1 HBF4·OEt2, H2O2 1:0:0
7 1 HBF4·OEt2, m-CPBA 2:5:0
8 1 H2O2, 4 (20 mol %) 0:1:0
9 1 H2SO4, H2O2, 4 (20 mol %) 66%
10 1 HBF4·OEt2, DMDO 15%
a

One equivalent of oxidant was used for entries 1, 3, 7, and 10. Two equivalents were used for entries 4–6, 8, and 9. Four equivalents were used for entry 2. For entries 4–10, a 5:1 mixture of CH2Cl2:HFIP was used as the solvent, and the reactions were run at room temperature.

b

Ratios determined by integration of HPLC chromatograms.

c

Isolated yield.