Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2019 Feb 14;95(4):914–928. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.10.031

Table 4.

Comparison of the clinical characteristics of the 138 affected patients with chronic kidney disease by molecular genetic diagnostic category following whole exome sequencing

Molecular genetic diagnostic category post WES Median age in years of onset of ESKD [years] (range) CKD only in adulthooda (%) ESKD in adulthoodb n (%) ESKD in childhoodc n (%) Total numbers of “solved” individual s n (%)
Cystic Kidney Disease 27 (12-70) 0 8 (73) 3 (27) 11 (100)
CAKUT 21.5 (9–51) 6 (33) 7 (39) 5 (28) 18 (100)
Chronic GN 40 (20–52) 3 (43) 4 (57) 0 7 (100)
TIKD 38 (18–45) 3 (50) 3 (50) 0 6 (100)
Renal Tubulopathy 10, 38 2 (50) 1 (25) 1 (25) 4 (100)
Nephrolithiasis/Nephrocalcinosis 55 3 (75) 1 (25) 0 4 (100)
Steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome 37.5 (20-78) 0 4 (100) 0 4 (100)
Other disease category 6 0 0 1 (100) 1(100)
All molecular diagnostic categories 33 (6-78) 17 (31) 28 (51) 10 (18) 55 (100)

CAKUT, congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESKD, End Stage Kidney Disease; GN, glomerulonephritis; solved, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic monogenic mutation in a known CKD gene was detected following WES; TIKD, tubulo-interstitial kidney disease.

a

Adult patients who had CKD at time of analysis (i.e. Not yet progressed to ESKD in adulthood i.e. ≥ 18 years)

b

Patients who developed ESKD ≥ 18 years of age

c

Patients who developed ESKD < 18 years of age