Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 11;6(1):e13233. doi: 10.2196/13233

Table 3.

Logistic regression results for satisfaction with the quality of the video remote interpreting service (reference group: patients not satisfied).

Variable Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) P value
Age 1.01 (0.99-1.02) .19
Educationa 1.36 (0.94-1.96) .10
Genderb 0.73 (0.51-1.05) .09
Racec 1.30 (0.88-1.91) .16
Regular providerd 1.50 (1.04-2.17) .03
Interpreter interferencee 2.90 (1.97-4.27) <.001

aReference group: Patients with a college degree.

bReference group: Male patients.

cReference group: White patients.

dReference group: Patients responding “Yes.”

eReference group: Patients responding “Yes.”