Table 1.

Comparison of conformations and their corresponding aspect ratios between simulation using harmonic bending potential and theory for chain with L* = 600. Each simulation is repeated three times and the error bar is taken as the standard deviation among the three aspect ratios. The aspect ratios l*/r* and R*/r* are only shown for the bundle and torus conformations.

$K_{\mathsf{\theta }}$	ε	${\mathsf{\gamma }}_{\mathrm{b}}/{\mathsf{\gamma }}_{\mathrm{e}}{\mathsf{\sigma }}^3$	${\mathsf{\gamma }}_{\mathrm{e}}/{\mathsf{\gamma }}_{\mathrm{s}}$	Config. (Sim.)	Asp. ratio (Sim.)	Config. (Theory)	Asp. ratio (Theory)
1.5	1	0.65	0.91	G		G
3.0	1	0.65	1.30	G		G
7.5	1	0.65	3.23	B	4.3$\pm$1.4	B	6.0
10.0	1	0.65	2.77	T&B		T&B
13.0	1	0.65	4.31	T&B		T&B
15.0	1	0.65	6.46	T	4.4$\pm$1.1	T	2.6
30.0	1	0.65	12.92	T	9.2$\pm$1.2	T	4.2
150.0	1	0.65	44.60	RC		T	10.0