Table 2.

Comparison of photocatalytic performances of known MOFs/CPs used in the photoreduction of water to H₂ under UV and Vis light.

MOF/CP	H2 (μmol)	T (h)	TON	TOF (TON·h−1)	λ (nm)	Ref.
[RuII,III2(p-BDC)2BF4]n	29.3	4	47.0 1	11.7	>420	[47]
[RuII,III2(p-BDC)2Cl]n [RuII,III2(p-BDC)2Br]n	13.5 46.7	4	5.38 2 18.7 2	1.34 4.67	>420	[48]
Ti–MOF–NH2@Pt	11.7	3	1.17 2	0.39	>420	[49]
Ti–MOF–NH2@Pt	15.5	3	1.5 2	0.5	>420	[50]
NH2–UiO–66(Zr) NH2–UiO–66(Zr)@Pt	107.1 125	3	2.38 2 2.77 2	0.93 0.79	370	[51]
MIL–101(Cr)@CdS/Pt	300	1	150 2	75.5	>420	[52]
UiO–66(Zr)@Pt UiO–66(Zr)@RhB UiO–66(Zr)@RhB/Pt	0.97 0.67 1.4	5	19.5 3 13.5 3 28 3	3.9 2.7 5.6	>420	[53]
UiO–67[Ir(ppy)2(bpy)]@Pt	64.8	6	1620 1	270	420	[54]
MOF–253–Pt	3000	34	5.6 1	0.17	420	[55]
UiO–66–[FeFe](dcbdt)(CO)6	3.5	2.5	0.7 2	0.28	470	[56]
{[Sm2Cu5(OH)2(pydc)6(H2O)8]·I8} {[Eu2Cu5(OH)2(pydc)6(H2O)8]·I8} {[Gd2Cu5(OH)2(pydc)6(H2O)8]·I8} {[Tb2Cu5(OH)2(pydc)6(H2O)8]·I8}	979.0 1131.4 1025.2 1052.5	5	9790 3 11,314 3 10,252 3 10,525 3	1958.0 2262.8 2050.4 2105.0	420	[57]
(TBA)2[CuII(BBTZ)2(x-Mo8O26)]	4.68	6	0.05 2	0.008	<400	[58]
{[AlOH)]2H2TCPP(DMF3–(H2O)2}	3.15	8	900 3	112.5	420	[59]
{[Zn(bpy)3][NaRu(C2O4)3]}n	0.36	8	0.04 1,3 36 2	0.005 4.5	≥417	This work
	0.36		0.04 1,3 36 2	0.005 4.5	≤366
{[Zn(bpy)3][LiRu(C2O4)3]}n	0.34		0.03 1,3 34 2	0.004 4.25	≥417
	0.65		0.06 1,3 65 2	0.007 8.12	≤366
{[Cu(bpy)3][NaRu(C2O4)3]}n	0.30		0.03 1,3 30 2	0.004 3.75	≥417
	0.30		0.03 1,3 30 2	0.004 3.75	≤366
{[Cu(bpy)3][LiRu(C2O4)3]}n	0.39		0.04 1,3 39 2	0.005 4.87	≥417
	0.35		0.04 1,3 35 2	0.004 4.37	≤366
{[Ru(bpy)3][NaRu(C2O4)3]}n	0.45		0.04 1,3 45 2	0.005 5.62	≥417
	0.71		0.07 1,3 71 2	0.009 8.75	≤366
{[Ru(bpy)3][LiRu(C2O4)3]}n	0.52		0.05 1,3 52 2	0.006 6.5	≥417
	0.83		0.08 1,3 83 2	0.01 10.4	≤366
{[Os(bpy)3][NaRu(C2O4)3]}n	0.48		0.05 1,3 48 2	0.006 6	≥417
	1.08		0.11 1,3 108 2	0.13 13.5	≤366
{[Os(bpy)3][LiRu(C2O4)3]}n	0.64		0.06 1,3 64 2	0.008 8	≥417
	1.23		0.12 1,3 123 2	0.15 15.4	≤366

¹ TON = μmol H₂·μmol ⁻¹ MOF; ² TON = μmol H₂·mg⁻¹ MOF; ³ TON= μmol H₂·g⁻¹ MOF.