Table 1. Socioeconomic characteristics of 96 Indian surrogates and of Indian women aged 20–34 years old in the general population.
Indian surrogates (N = 96) |
General population of Indian women aged 20–34 (N = 60,852) |
P-value of permutation test(1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n/N | % | % | |||
Age | (years) | ||||
20–24 | 12/93 | 13 | 37 | <0.001 | |
25–29 | 41/93 | 44 | 34 | <0.05 | |
≥30 (2) | 40/93 | 43 | 29 | <0.01 | |
Indian region | |||||
Northern | 14/96 | 15 | 37 | <0.001 | |
Western | 58/96 | 60 | 32 | <0.001 | |
Southern | 15/96 | 16 | 13 | 0.48 | |
Eastern | 9/96 | 9 | 18 | <0.001 | |
Married living with husband | 81/96 | 84 | 85 | 0.87 | |
Number of children | |||||
None | 0/95 | 0 | 20 | NA(3) | |
1–2 | 73/95 | 77 | 44 | <0.001 | |
3–4 | 21/95 | 22 | 27 | 0.25 | |
5 | 1/95 | 1 | 9 | <0.001 | |
First cild at age ≤ 20 | 33/39 | 85 | 48 | <0.001 | |
At least 2ndary education (4) | 51/91 | 56 | 39 | <0.01 | |
Family income ≥ extreme poverty line (1.25 USD) | 56/66 | 85 | 58 | <0.001 | |
Family income ≥ poverty line (2 USD) | 47/66 | 71 | 24 | <0.001 | |
Employed (5) | 55/95 | 58 | 42 | <0.01 | |
Hindu religion | 60/85 | 71 | 82 | 0.02 |
(1) Permutation tests compared percentages observed among surrogates and in national data for one category. Tests were done with the R function “Permutation Tests for Nonparametric Statistics” (perm.test, version 1.4, package: jmuOutlier) developed by Steven T. Garren.
(2) Age was divided into 5-year groups in order to be comparable with national data. Regarding guidelines for surrogacy, 82 surrogates were aged 21–35 years old, 1 surrogate was aged 20 years and 9 were aged 36–45 (of whom only 2 women were aged 40 years or above).
(3) NA: Not applicable, as no surrogate had 0 children
(4) At least 7 or 8 years of education (secondary, graduate and post-graduate).
(5) Women employed before surrogacy. In the national data, women employed at some point in the 12 months preceding the survey.