Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 25;14(3):e0214097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214097

Table 1. Socioeconomic characteristics of 96 Indian surrogates and of Indian women aged 20–34 years old in the general population.

    Indian surrogates
(N = 96)
General population of Indian women
aged 20–34 (N = 60,852)
P-value of permutation test(1)
    n/N % %
Age (years)
20–24 12/93 13 37 <0.001
25–29 41/93 44 34 <0.05
≥30 (2) 40/93 43 29 <0.01
Indian region
Northern 14/96 15 37 <0.001
Western 58/96 60 32 <0.001
Southern 15/96 16 13 0.48
Eastern 9/96 9 18 <0.001
Married living with husband 81/96 84 85 0.87
Number of children
None 0/95 0 20 NA(3)
1–2 73/95 77 44 <0.001
3–4 21/95 22 27 0.25
5 1/95 1 9 <0.001
First cild at age ≤ 20 33/39 85 48 <0.001
At least 2ndary education (4) 51/91 56 39 <0.01
Family income ≥ extreme poverty line (1.25 USD) 56/66 85 58 <0.001
Family income ≥ poverty line (2 USD) 47/66 71 24 <0.001
Employed (5) 55/95 58 42 <0.01
Hindu religion 60/85 71 82 0.02

(1) Permutation tests compared percentages observed among surrogates and in national data for one category. Tests were done with the R function “Permutation Tests for Nonparametric Statistics” (perm.test, version 1.4, package: jmuOutlier) developed by Steven T. Garren.

(2) Age was divided into 5-year groups in order to be comparable with national data. Regarding guidelines for surrogacy, 82 surrogates were aged 21–35 years old, 1 surrogate was aged 20 years and 9 were aged 36–45 (of whom only 2 women were aged 40 years or above).

(3) NA: Not applicable, as no surrogate had 0 children

(4) At least 7 or 8 years of education (secondary, graduate and post-graduate).

(5) Women employed before surrogacy. In the national data, women employed at some point in the 12 months preceding the survey.