Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 25;14(3):e0214287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214287

Table 1. Average numbers (± SD) of peroxisomes in ERMES mutant strains in two different genetic backgrounds.

strain Mean ± SD
Glucose Oleate
BY4741 2.12 ± 0.18 3.84 ± 0.09
mmm1Δ 2.56 ± 0.16 4.81 ± 0.88
mdm34Δ 2.77 ± 0.17 6.23 ± 0.42
mdm10Δ 5.02* ± 0.05 6.01 ± 0.01
mdm12Δ 4.77* ± 0.08 6.88* ± 0.19
BY/W303 2.31 ± 0.14 4.0 ± 0.41
mmm1Δ 2.33 ± 0.27 4.59 ± 0.59
mdm34Δ 2.82 ± 0.45 6.39 ± 0.18
mdm10Δ 5.32* ± 0.4 7.44* ± 0.14
mdm12Δ 5.12* ± 0.01 9.53* ± 0.4
WT + MDM12 2.2 ± 0.3 4.25 ± 0.3
mdm12Δ + MDM12 2.6 ± 0.2 4.65 ± 0.1

Average numbers of peroxisomes per cell observed in the different ERMES mutant strains (BY4741 and mixed BY/W303 genetic backgrounds) grown in glucose or oleate and, presented as mean ± SD (Standard Deviation). Statistical analysis (Student’s test) revealed that the differences in average number of peroxisomes in mdm10Δ and mdm12Δ cells, but not in mmm1Δ and mdm34Δ cells, is significantly different compared to the wild-type controls (*, p-values < 0.005). For each strain, the number of peroxisomes was counted from images of two counts of at least 100 non-budding cells from three independent experiments.