Table 2. Multiple regression analysis of the HOMA-Adiponectin and HOMA-IR with clamp-derived insulin sensitivity index.

Dependent variable	Model	Independent variables	B	95% CI	P-value	R2 for model
ISI, mg/kgLBM-1. min-1 per mU/L x 100a,b	1	HOMA-Adiponectina	-0.441	-0.581 to -0.300	< 0.001	0.471
		Sexc	0.083	-0.065 to 0.231	0.264
		Tanner staged	-0.122	-0.276 to 0.032	0.117
	2	HOMA-Adiponectina	-0.349	-0.506 to -0.192	< 0.001	0.521
		Sexd	0.123	-0.23 to 0.269	0.097
		Tanner staged	-0.125	-0.273 to 0.023	0.096
		Waist circumference-to-height ratio	-1.018	-1.907 to -0.128	0.026
	3	HOMA-IRa	-1.049	-1.282 to -0.817	< 0.001	0.638
		Sexd	-0.011	-0.135 to 0.113	0.856
		Tanner staged	0.008	-0.125 to 0.142	0.899
	4	HOMA-IRa	-0.968	-1.259 to -0.676	< 0.001	0.644
		Sexd	0.011	-0.122 to 0.145	0.867
		Tanner staged	-0.003	-0.138 to 0.133	0.968
		Waist circumference-to-height ratio	-0.384	-1.207 to 0.439	0.353

Abbreviations: B, unstandardized coefficient; CI, confidence interval; ISI, insulin sensitivity index; LBM, lean body mass; HOMA-Adiponectin, homeostasis model assessment of adiponectin; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; NA, not applicable

^aLogarithmic transformation was performed.

^bInsulin sensitivity index (ISI) expressed as milligrams of glucose infused per kilogram of lean body mass (LBM) per minute.

^c0 represents the female and 1 the male.

^d0 represents the postpubertal stage and 1 the pubertal stage