Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 25;2019(3):CD013069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013069.pub2

Summary of findings 4. Cognitive training compared to alternative treatment in the medium term (3 to 12 months post intervention) for people with mild to moderate dementia.

Cognitive training compared to alternative treatment in the medium term (3 to 12 months post intervention) for people with mild to moderate dementia
Patient or population: people with mild to moderate dementia
 Setting: Community dwelling or in residential careIntervention: cognitive training
 Comparison: alternative treatment in the medium term (3 to 12 months post intervention)
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No. of participants
 (studies) Certainty of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with alternative treatment in the medium term (3 to 12 months post intervention) Risk with cognitive training
Change in a global measure of cognition (composite) Mean change in a global measure of cognition (composite) was set at 0 SDs SMD 1.31 SD higher
 (1.03 lower to 3.65 higher) 73
 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 VERY LOW We are unable to determine whether there is any effect on global cognition (composite) due to very low quality of the evidence
Change in a global measure of cognition Mean change in a global measure of cognition was set at 0 SDs SMD 3.2 higher
 (2.89 lower to 9.29 higher) 73
 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 VERY LOW We are unable to determine whether there is any effect on performance in a screening measure of global cognition due to very low quality of the evidence
Change in disease progression See comment (0 studies) None of the included studies have evaluated this outcome
Change in delayed memory Mean change in delayed memory was set at 0 SDs SMD 3.13 higher
 (3.57 lower to 9.83 higher) 73
 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 VERY LOW We are unable to determine whether there is any effect on performance in delayed memory due to very low quality of the evidence
Change in participants' mood Mean change in participants' mood was set at 0 SDs SMD 0.66 lower
 (1.35 lower to 0.02 higher) 39
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOWa Cognitive training may not have an effect on a participants' mood
Change in capacity for activities of daily living See comment (0 studies) None of the included studies have evaluated this outcome
Change in mood and well‐being (caregiver) See comment (0 studies) None of the included studies have evaluated this outcome
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial; SD: standard deviation; SMD: standardised mean difference.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
 Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
 Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
 Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aImprecision: downgraded 2 points for very serious concerns related to imprecision because the confidence interval includes positive effect, negligible effect, and effect in the direction of the control group.