Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 25;2019(3):CD013069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013069.pub2

2. Summary of duration of interventions and timing of assessments.

Study Duration (weeks) Session frequency (per week) Total number of sessions Session duration (minutes) Total direct intervention (minutes) Total direct intervention (hours) Session format Adherence rates Fidelity measures
Beck 1988 6 (cognitive training) 3 18 Approx. 35 Approx. 630 Approx. 10.5 Individual, with a research assistant Not reported Not reported
  NA (control) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Heiss 1993 24 (cognitive training) 2 48 60 2880 48 Individual Not reported Not reported
  24 (social support) 1 24 60 1440 24 Individual Not reported Not reported
  24 (cognitive training+pyritinol) 2 48 60 2880 48 Individual Not reported Not reported
  24 (cognitive training+phosphatidylserine) 2 48 60 2880 48 Individual Not reported Not reported
Quayhagen 1995 12 (cognitive training) 6 72 60 4320 72 Individual Not reported Caregiver and care recipient were trained together in programme implementation techniques. Return demonstrations by caregivers were required to validate training
  NA (passive control) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
  12 (active control) Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Caregiver and care recipient were trained together in programme implementation techniques. Return demonstrations by caregivers were required to validate training
de Vreese 1998 NA (cognitive training) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
  12 (cognitive training+ChE‐I, after 12 weeks on drug) 2 24 45 1080 18 Individual Not reported Not reported
  12 (placebo drug) NA NA NA NA NA NA Not reported Not reported
  12 (AChE‐I, after 12 weeks on drug) NA NA NA NA NA NA Not reported Not reported
Quayhagen 2000 8 (cognitive training) 1 8 90 720 12 Individual, with help from caregiver Not reported Ongoing monitoring of personnel performance to ensure uniformity and consistency of administration of assessments or interventions
  8 (dyadic counselling) 1 8 90 720 12 Dyad Not reported Ongoing monitoring of personnel performance to ensure uniformity and consistency of administration of assessments or interventions
  8 (seminar groups) 1 8 90 720 12 Group Not reported Ongoing monitoring of personnel performance to ensure uniformity and consistency of administration of assessments or interventions
  8 (daycare) 7 8 240 1920 32 Group Not reported Ongoing monitoring of personnel performance to ensure uniformity and consistency of administration of assessments or interventions
  NA (wait‐list control) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Davis 2001 5 (cognitive training) 1 5 60 300 5 Individual Not reported Not reported
  5 (control) 1 5 60 300 5 Individual Not reported Not reported
Koltai 2001 5 (cognitive training ‐ group) 1 5 60 300 5 Group Not reported Not reported
  6 (cognitive training ‐ individual) 1 6 Not reported Not reported Not reported Individual Not reported Not reported
  NA (wait‐list control) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Cahn‐Weiner 2003 6 (cognitive training) 1 6 Not reported Not reported Not reported Group, with a clinical neuropsychologist 1 participant did not complete the first session, and 2 participants did not complete the fourth session "All sessions were identical for all participants, with the memory group instructor relying on a trainer's manual with scripts for how to present the information"
  6 (control) 1 6 45 270 4.5 Group, with a clinical neuropsychologist 4 participants missed 1 session, and 1 participant missed 2 sessions Not reported
Galante 2007 4 (cognitive training) 3 12 60 720 12 Individual, with a neuropsychologist Not reported Not reported
  4 (control) 3 12 60 720 12 Individual, with a neuropsychologist Not reported Not reported
Neely 2009 8 (cognitive training ‐ collaborative intervention) 1 8 30 to 40 Approx. 280 Approx. 4.5 Dyads, with a research assistant Not reported Not reported
  8 (cognitive training ‐ individual intervention) 1 8 30 to 40 Approx. 280 Approx. 4.5 Individual, with a research assistant Not reported Not reported
  NA (control group) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Kawashima 2005 24 (cognitive training) 2 to 6 48 to 144 Approx. 20 960 to 2880 16 to 48 Individual, with the possibility to ask staff members for advice Not reported Not reported
  NA (control) NA NA NA NA NA NA Not reported Not reported
Boller 2011 2 (cognitive training ‐ recollection) 12 24 60 1440 24 Not reported Not reported Not reported
  2 (cognitive training ‐ recognition) 12 24 60 1440 24 Not reported Not reported Not reported
  NA (control) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Fernández‐Calvo 2011 12 (cognitive training ‐ BBA) 3 36 60 2160 36 Individual, with an OT and a psychologist Not reported Not reported
  12 (cognitive training ‐ IPP) 3 36 60 2160 36 Individual, with an OT and a psychologist Not reported Not reported
  NA (control) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Goudour 2011 12 (cognitive training) 1 12 50 600 10 Individual, with a neuropsychologist. Not reported Not reported
  12 (control) 1 12 50 600 10 Individual, with a clinical psychologist. Not reported Not reported
Jelcic 2012 12 (cognitive training) 2 24 60 1440 24 Group, provided by a neuropsychologist Not reported Not reported
  12 (control) 2 24 60 1440 24 Group, provided by a neuropsychologist Not reported Not reported
Bergamaschi 2013 20 (cognitive training) 5 100 120 12000 200 Group, supervised by a neuropsychologist Not reported Not reported
  20 (control) Presumed to be 5 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Group Not reported Not reported
Lee 2013 6 (cognitive training ‐ CELP) 2 12 30 360 6 Individual, with a therapist Not reported Not reported
  6 (cognitive training ‐ TELP) 2 12 30 360 6 Individual, with a therapist Not reported Not reported
  6 (active control) 2 12 30 360 6 Not reported Not reported Not reported
Mapelli 2013 8 (cognitive training) 5 40 60 2400 40 With a therapist Not reported Not reported
  8 (control ‐ occupational therapy) 5 40 60 2400 40 Not reported Not reported Not reported
  NA (control ‐ usual care) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Jelcic 2014 12 (cognitive training ‐ LSS‐tele) 2 24 60 1440 24 Small groups, provided by a therapist Not reported Not reported
  12 (cognitive training ‐ LSS‐direct) 2 24 60 1440 24 Small groups, provided by a therapist Not reported Not reported
  12 (control) 2 24 60 1440 24 Small groups, provided by a therapist Not reported Not reported
Quintana Hernandez 2014 104 (cognitive training) 3 (IPP) 288 90 25920 432 Group, with a clinical psychologist Not reported Not reported
  104 (muscular relaxation) 3 288 90 25920 432 Group, with a clinical psychologist Not reported Not reported
  104 (mindfulness) 3 288 90 25920 432 Group, with a clinical psychologist Not reported Not reported
  NA (passive control) NA NA NA NA NA NA Not reported Not reported
Kim 2015 8 (cognitive training) 1 8 60 480 8 Individual and in a group Not reported Not reported
  8 (control) 1 8 60 480 8 Not reported Not reported Not reported
Amieva 2016 96 (cognitive training) 1 (during the first 3 months); 1 every 6 weeks (for the next 21 months) 15 90 1350 22.5 Groups Not reported Manual detailing the guidelines of each intervention was provided. Standardised procedures to guarantee homogeneity. Professional visits to therapists to ensure that interventions were applied in accordance with protocol
  NA (control ‐ usual care) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
  96 (reminiscence therapy) 1 (during the first 3 months); 1 every 6 weeks (for the next 21 months) 15 90 1350 22.5 Groups Not reported Manual detailing the guidelines of each intervention was provided. Standardised procedures to guarantee homogeneity. Professional visits to therapists to ensure that interventions were applied in accordance with protocol
  96 (cognitive rehabilitation) 1 (during the first 3 months); 1 every 6 weeks (for the next 21 months) 15 90 1350 22.5 Individual Not reported Manual detailing the guidelines of each intervention was provided. Standardised procedures to guarantee homogeneity. Professional visits to therapists to ensure that interventions were applied in accordance with protocol
Cavallo 2016 12 (cognitive training) 3 36 30 1080 18 Individual, with a neuropsychologist Not reported Not reported
  12 (control) 3 36 30 1080 18 Individual, with a neuropsychologist Not reported Not reported
Kao 2016 6 (cognitive training ‐ spaced retrieval) 5 30 40 1200 20 With a trainer Not reported Not reported
  6 (cognitive training ‐ spaced retrieval+Montessori activities) 5 30 40 1200 20 With a trainer Not reported Not reported
  na (control) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Barban 2016 12 (cognitive training) 2 24 60 1440 24 Small groups, provided by a cognitive therapist Not reported Not reported
  12 (control) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Giuli 2016 10 (cognitive training) 1 10 45 450 7.5 Individually, with homewrok exercises with support of a caregiver Not reported Not reported
  10 (control) 1 10 45 450 7.5 Not reported Not reported Not reported
Venturelli 2016 12 (cognitive training) 5 60 60 3600 60 Performed in collaboration with patients’ caregivers 85±12% in the CT group Not reported
  12 (aerobic exercise) 5 60 60 3600 60 Performed in collaboration with patients’ caregivers 78±8% in the AE group Not reported
  12 (aerobic exercise+cognitive training) 5 60 60 3600 60 Performed in collaboration with patients’ caregivers 75±14% in the AE+CT group Not reported
  NA (control) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Tsantali 2017 16 (cognitive training) 3 48 90 4320 72 Individual with licensed psychologist Not reported Not reported
  16 (cognitive stimulation) 3 48 90 4320 72 Individual with licensed psychologist Not reported Not reported
  16 (control) NA NA NA NA NA NA Not reported Not reported
Brueggen 2017 12 (cognitive training) 5 60 Approx. 15 Approx. 900 Approx. 15 Individual homework, with 1 meeting per month 100% Not reported
  12 (cognitive rehabilitation) 2 24 60 1440 24 Small group guided by a psychologist and an occupational therapist 100% (including only the 8 participants who completed the study and were, therefore, analysed) Intervention was based on the CORDIAL programme, via a manual‐guided approach
Giovagnoli 2017 12 (cognitive training) 2 24 45 1080 18 Small groups of 3 participants, guided by a neuropsychologist Not reported CT was co‐ordinated by a neuropsychologist using defined materials and procedures
  12 (music therapy) 2 24 45 1080 18 Small groups of 3 participants, guided by a music therapist Not reported Active music therapy was provided by a music therapist. Sessions were videotaped and evaluated via a structured assessment
  12 (neuroeducation) 2 24 45 1080 18 Small groups of 3 participants, co‐ordinated by a neurologist Not reported Not reported
Serino 2017 3‐4 (VR group ‐ AD) 3 10 20 200 3.3 Individual with a neuropsychologist Not reported Not reported
  3‐4 (VR group ‐ normal ageing) 3 10 20 200 3.3 Individual with a neuropsychologist Not reported Not reported
  NA (control) NA NA NA NA NA Underwent traditional cognitive rehabilitative activities with the neuropsychological staff NA NA
Trebbastoni 2018 24 (cognitive training) 2 48 75 3600 60 Group 11% (6 participants) attended less than 80% of sessions of the first period of the study (from T0 to T1).
 In the second period, 72.9% attended more than 95% of sessions, 10,4% attended 90% to 95%, 4.2% attended 85% to 89%, and 12.5% attended 80% to 84% Study authors reported high adherence to a strict protocol
  NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Kallio 2018 12 (cognitive training) 2 24 45 1080 18 Group/individual when required
   Mean attendance at 22 (92%) sessions
   CT was administered by trained psychology students under the supervision of an experienced neuropsychologist
  NA (control) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
  

AChEI: anti‐cholinesterase inhibitor.

AD: Alzheimer's disease.

BBA: Big Brain Academy.

CELP: computerised errorless learning‐based memory training programme.

ChEI: cholinesterase inhibitor.

CT: cognitive traininng.

IPP: Integrated Psychostimulation Program.

LSS: lexical‐semantic simulation.

NA: not applicable.

TELP: therapist‐led errorless programme.

VR: virtual reality.