Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2018 Nov 10;19(4):1168–1177. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15143

Table 1:

Characteristics of patients suspected for chronic rejection after face vascularized composite tissue transplantation compared to all patients of the Brigham and Women’s Hospital face transplant cohort. Tx – transplantation; CR – chronic rejection; AR – acute rejection; Tac – Tacrolimus; MMF – Mycophenolate mofetil; Pred – Prednisone; Myf – Myfortic; Sir - Sirolimus; Bela - Belatacept

Mean Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5 Patient 6 Patient 7
Type of Transplant Full Face Full Face Partial Face Full Face Full Face Partial Face Partial Face
Initial injury Chimpanzee attack Electrical Burn Electrical Burn Electrical Burn Acid Burn Ballistic Trauma Ballistic Trauma
Age at Tx 47 (±19.1) 57 25 59 30 44 39 33
Donor age 50 (±9.2) 42 48 60 31 56 23 51
Sex female male male male female male male
Signs of chronic rejection Yes Yes Yes No No No No
Time to CR in months 46 (±21.5) 45 25 68 - - - -
Total time post-transplantion 76,4 (±23.5) 86 88 112 87 65 45 52
Total # AR episodes 4,4 (±1.3) 4 5 4 5 6 2 5
# AR episodes before CR 2(±1) 2 1 3 - - - -
Donor Specific Antibodies No No No No Yes No No
Immunosuppression Tac, Sir, Myf Tac, MMF, Pred Tac, MMF, Pred Tac, MMF, Pred Tac, MMF, Pred Tac, MMF Tac, MMF, Pred, Bela