Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 25;2019(3):CD012387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012387.pub2

Li 2017.

Methods Pre‐post quasi‐experimental design
Participants Oncology patients in general
Country: Canada
Age: unclear
Sex: unclear
Inclusion criteria: unclear
Exclusion criteria: unclear
N randomised: unclear
N in analysis: unclear
Interventions Content of screen:WELL‐BEING: ESAS‐r cut‐offs are used to trigger further ePROM assessment of pain (BPI), fatigue (CFS), anxiety (GAD‐7), and depression (PHQ‐9)
Interventionist: unclear
Intervention procedure: unclear
Conditions for implementation: unclear
Comparative condition: unclear
Length of follow‐up: unclear
Outcomes Primary outcomes/Secondary outcomes

  1. impact of the intervention

  2. anxiety

  3. depression

  4. fatigue

  5. pain

  6. patient experience and activation

  7. health care utilisation

  8. clinician satisfaction

  9. team collaboration

  10. detection and amelioration of general and specific forms of distress


Outcome time points: 6 months' pre‐ and post‐iPEHOC intervention implementation
Notes Information from conference abstract available ('Improving patient experience and health outcomes using electronic patient reported outcome measures: effects on distress and health outcomes'), no further information received from study authors