Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Nov 7;178:226–250. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.007

Table 9.

Child Level Descriptive Statistics for Experiment 2

Word Only
Vocabulary
Imageability
All children
Pairwise comparisonsa
Variable M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD)
n = 26
n = 26
n = 26
n = 78
SWE (RS) 30.88 (14.28) 31.31 (16.31) 34.12 (16.44) 32.10 (15.57) WO=VOC=IMAG
SWE (SS) 101.46 (14.32) 101.69 (16.21) 104.58 (16.14) 102.58 (15.45) WO=VOC=IMAG
PDE (RS) 13.31 (8.54) 13.15 (8.76) 12.08 (8.48) 12.85 (8.50) WO=VOC=IMAG
PDE (SS) 101.15 (16.82) 101.35 (16.36) 99.46 (15.92) 100.65 (16.17) WO=VOC=IMAG
PA (RS) 16.54 (7.64) 18.31 (5.99) 17.42 (7.63) 17.42 (7.07) WO=VOC=IMAG
PA (SS) 10.31 (2.85) 10.92 (2.46) 10.88 (3.05) 10.71 (2.78) WO=VOC=IMAG
RAN (RS) 32.65 (11.34) 34.38 (13.21) 33.00 (12.31) 33.35 (12.17) WO=VOC=IMAG
RAN (SS) 10.19 (1.30) 9.88 (1.77) 10.35 (1.50) 10.14 (1.53) WO=VOC=IMAG
VOC (RS) 18.38 (3.72) 19.15 (2.31) 18.31 (3.06) 18.62 (3.07) WO=VOC=IMAG
VOC (SS) 98.73 (13.12) 101.50 (7.75) 98.35 (10.68) 99.53 (10.70) WO=VOC=IMAG

Note: SWE=TOWRE Sight Word Efficiency; PDE=TOWRE Pseudoword Decoding; PA = Phonological Awareness; RAN=Rapid Automatized Naming; VOC= Vocabulary

a

Mean comparisons were conducted using ANOVA with Bonferonni post-hoc pairwise comparisons.