Table 4. Logistic regression estimates for odds of diarrheal episodes according to mass media exposure.
Mass media exposure | Crude | Adjusted | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | P-value | OR1 | P-value | ||
(95% CI) | (95% CI) | ||||
Newspaper or magazine (n=7,061) | |||||
Not exposed | 1 | 1 | |||
Exposed | 1.07 | 0.63 | 1.14 | 0.38 | |
(0.81–1.42) | (0.85–1.51) | ||||
Radio (n=7,065) | |||||
Not exposed | 1 | 1 | |||
Exposed | 1.15 | 0.45 | 1.12 | 0.55 | |
(0.81–1.64) | (0.78–1.59) | ||||
Television (n=7,067) | |||||
Not exposed | 1 | 1 | |||
Exposed | 0.93 | 0.55 | 0.98 | 0.88 | |
(0.75–1.16) | (0.78–1.24) |
1Adjusted for place of residence, mother’s age, education, working status, religion and honsehold’s wealth index
Reference was the ‘not exposed to media’ group (for all three media and combined media).
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio