Table 4.
Clinical validation of HABIT on patients with acute stroke.
| HABIT group (n = 5) | RRP group (n = 5) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMA | ARAT | FMA | ARAT | ||||||
| No. | Baseline | Post-training | Baseline | Post-training | No. | Baseline | Post-training | Baseline | Post-training |
| #1 | 32 | 36 | 32 | 34 | #1 | 30 | 33 | 31 | 33 |
| #2 | 35 | 45 | 33 | 38 | #2 | 32 | 33 | 31 | 34 |
| #3 | 33 | 36 | 31 | 33 | #3 | 32 | 34 | 29 | 30 |
| #4 | 33 | 37 | 30 | 33 | #4 | 37 | 39 | 33 | 34 |
| #5 | 29 | 36 | 34 | 37 | #5 | 33 | 34 | 32 | 34 |
RRR, the routine rehabilitation program; HABIT, Hand-arm bimanual intensive training; FMA, Fugl-Meyer assessment; ARAT, action research arm test; p(FMA, baseline, HABIT vs. RRP) = 0.798815616; p(FMA, post-training, HABIT vs. RRP) = 0.148803893; p(ARAT, baseline, HABIT vs. RRP) = 0.433301901; p(ARAT, post-training, HABIT vs. RRP) = 0.16682164; p(HABIT group, FMA, baseline vs. post-training) = 0.030637606; p(HABIT group, ARAT, baseline vs. post-training) = 0.049413148.