Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 20;8(3):953–962. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1973

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Correlation of sIL‐2R level with TMTV. In the training population (n = 64), positive correlation between sIL‐2R and TMTV (Pearson R 2 = 0.490; P = 0.00004) (A) is shown. Positive correlation between sIL‐2R and TMTV (Pearson R 2 = 0.461; P = 0.00000631) (B) in the validation cohort (n = 86) is shown