Methods | RCT Length of follow‐up: 7 days following each vaccination; 3 to 5 weeks after second vaccination Adverse event data collection methods: unclear |
|
Participants |
Number: 117 enrolled; 111 evaluable Age range: 3 to 6 months (beginning); 3 to 6 months (end) Inclusion criteria: not specified Exclusion criteria: not specified |
|
Interventions | RV1 1. RIX4414 (RV1) 1.1. 1 x 105 dose; 41 participants (randomized) 1.2. 1 x 106 dose; 39 participants (randomized) 2. Placebo: 37 participants Schedule: 2 doses given at a 6‐ to 10‐week interval |
|
Outcomes |
Clinical outcome measures (safety and efficacy) 1. Reactogenicity*: symptoms of rotavirus illness, including fever, diarrhoea, and vomiting; measured for 7 days after each dose *Although mentioned in the methods, no results are presented Outcomes to measure immunogenicity 2. Vaccine take: faecal shedding of rotavirus antigen (review includes data from after either dose 1 or 2) 3. Seroconversion: serum rotavirus IgA responses (increases in level of serum rotavirus IgA ≥ 4 fold) (review includes data from after either dose 1 or 2) |
|
Immunization status | Not specified | |
Location | Cincinnati and Baltimore, USA WHO mortality stratum A |
|
Notes |
Date: July to December 1996 Source of funding: "Avant Immunotherapeutics, to which the 89‐12 vaccine candidate was licensed and which sublicensed its product to GlaxoSmithKline (which developed Rotarix from 89‐12)." 89‐12 was the precursor to RV1 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study designed" |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study designed" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No impact on intervention effect estimate Quote: "Of the 80 vaccine recipients in this trial, 2 had evidence of natural rotavirus infection before administration of the first dose, determined on the basis of rotavirus IgA in their serum. These, along with the 3 who received only 1 dose of vaccine, were eliminated from further analyses". |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No information |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No information |