Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 26;2019(3):CD008521. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008521.pub4
Methods RCT
Length of follow‐up: 7 days following each vaccination; 3 to 5 weeks after second vaccination
Adverse event data collection methods: unclear
Participants Number: 117 enrolled; 111 evaluable
Age range: 3 to 6 months (beginning); 3 to 6 months (end)
Inclusion criteria: not specified
Exclusion criteria: not specified
Interventions RV1
1. RIX4414 (RV1) 1.1. 1 x 105 dose; 41 participants (randomized) 1.2. 1 x 106 dose; 39 participants (randomized)
2. Placebo: 37 participants
Schedule: 2 doses given at a 6‐ to 10‐week interval
Outcomes Clinical outcome measures (safety and efficacy)
1. Reactogenicity*: symptoms of rotavirus illness, including fever, diarrhoea, and vomiting; measured for 7 days after each dose
*Although mentioned in the methods, no results are presented
Outcomes to measure immunogenicity
2. Vaccine take: faecal shedding of rotavirus antigen (review includes data from after either dose 1 or 2)
3. Seroconversion: serum rotavirus IgA responses (increases in level of serum rotavirus IgA ≥ 4 fold) (review includes data from after either dose 1 or 2)
Immunization status Not specified
Location Cincinnati and Baltimore, USA
WHO mortality stratum A
Notes Date: July to December 1996
Source of funding: "Avant Immunotherapeutics, to which the 89‐12 vaccine candidate was licensed and which sublicensed its product to GlaxoSmithKline (which developed Rotarix from 89‐12)."
89‐12 was the precursor to RV1
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study designed"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study designed"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No impact on intervention effect estimate Quote: "Of the 80 vaccine recipients in this trial, 2 had evidence of natural rotavirus infection before administration of the first dose, determined on the basis of rotavirus IgA in their serum. These, along with the 3 who received only 1 dose of vaccine, were eliminated from further analyses".
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No information
Other bias Unclear risk No information