Methods | RCT Length of follow‐up: 2 weeks after last dose Adverse event data collection methods: not reported |
|
Participants |
Number: Infant cohort: 48 enrolled and randomized, child cohort: 48 enrolled and randomized Inclusion criteria: healthy infants aged 6 to 12 weeks, and healthy children aged 2 to 6 years, there was also a cohort of adults (not reported in this review) Exclusion criteria: receiving other live vaccines 14 days before or after study vaccine; prior administration of any rotavirus vaccine; elevated temperature, with axillary temperature ≥ 37.1 °C 24 hours before study vaccine; prior or active gastrointestinal illnesses; immunodeficiency |
|
Interventions | 1. 2.0 mL RV5 (V260) administered orally. The vaccine consists of an oral solution of 5 live human‐bovine reassortant rotaviruses (24 infants, 24 children) 2. 2.0 mL matching placebo to RV5 administered orally (24 infants, 24 children) Schedule: infant cohort: 3 doses of RV5/placebo at 3 separate visits scheduled 28 to 70 days apart. The third dose was administered by 32 weeks of age; child cohort: one dose |
|
Outcomes |
Clinical outcome measures 1. Serious adverse events, up to 14 days post‐vaccination, including intussusception (data from correspondence with Merck; Merck 2012). 2. Adverse events requiring discontinuation 3. Dropouts from the trial 4. Number of deaths (data from correspondence with Merck; Merck 2012). 5. Reactogenicity Outcomes to measure immunogenicity 6. Vaccine virus shedding in stools, day 3 to day 7 following each of the 3 doses of RV5/placebo |
|
Immunization status | Other live vaccines 14 days before or after study vaccine were not allowed | |
Location | China WHO mortality stratum B |
|
Notes |
Date: September 2009 to March 2010 Source of funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp Study rationale: "This study will assess the safety and tolerability of RV5 (V260) in the healthy Chinese populations. Approximately 144 participants will be enrolled and equally stratified into three age cohorts, Cohort I ages 19‐47 years, Cohort II ages 2‐6 years, and Cohort III ages 6‐12 weeks" |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | All participants were randomized according to a computer‐generated allocation schedule (Merck 2012) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Allocation numbers were generated for participants; investigators, adults, and parents/guardians of children were blinded throughout trial (Merck 2012) |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | RV5 was visibly indistinguishable from placebo; investigators, study personnel (internal and external) and parents/guardians were blinded throughout trial (Merck 2012) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Attrition balanced across groups with reasons reported for withdrawal |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All relevant outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No apparent other bias |