Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 11;8(3):1135–1147. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1934

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic markers for overall survival in gastric cancer

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR > |z| 95% CI HR > |z| 95% CI
Vimentin expression
High vs Low or no 2.167 0.017 * 1.151‐4.079
Trop2+/vimentin+ vs Trop2−/vimentin− 1.603 <0.001 * 1.272‐2.019 1.544 0.007 * 1.125‐2.119
Age
<60 vs ≥60 0.629 0.074 0.378‐1.947
Gender
Male vs Female 1.238 0.463 0.700‐2.191
Histological type
Tubular vs Mucinous vs signet ring cells vs othersa 0.776 0.233 0.511‐1.178
Differentiation
Well vs Moderate vs Poor 2.244 <0.001 * 1.481‐3.400
TNM stage
0 vs Ia + Ib vs IIa + IIb vs IIIa + IIIb vs IIIc + IV 6.949 <0.001 * 3.931‐12.285 5.731 <0.001 * 3.143‐10.452
Tumor size
T0 vs T1a + T1b + T2 vs T3 + T4a + T4b 2.387 <0.001 * 1.721‐3.310
Distant metastases
M0 vs M1 2.297 0.002 * 1.351‐3.905
a

Others include pallipary adenocarcinoma, 3 cases; adeno‐squamous carcinoma, 2 cases; and neuroendocrine carcinoma, 1 case.

*

P < 0.05.

Bold values are statistically significant.