Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 15;66(1):497–504. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13051

Table 2.

Analytical sensitivity of the two SVV‐1 RT‐LAMP assays using either P1 or P2 and compared to the rRT‐PCR

Sample/test Primer set Dilution
10−1 10−2 10−3 10−4 10−5 10−6 10−7 10−8 10−9
NC‐88‐23626
RT‐LAMP (T p) P1 07:30 07:20 08:00 09:00 12:25 12:45a 12:30a No T p No T p
P2 06:55 07:40 09:05 10:35 16:45a No T p No T p No T p No T p
rRT‐PCR (C T) 18.97 22.29 25.67 29.01 32.30 35.67 38.49 40.86a Undet.
LA‐97‐1278
RT‐LAMP (T p) P1 06:50 07:10 08:30 09:05 11:20 14:50 12:15a No T p No T p
P2 08:05 09:10 10:50 13:35 No T p No T p No T p No T p No T p
rRT‐PCR (C T) 17.00 20.24 23.57 26.96 30.45 33.74 37.19 39.85b Undet.

Values are means of three replicates. NC‐88‐23626 and LA‐97‐1278 are SVV‐1 isolates.

P1: primer set 1, P2: primer set 2.

a

C T/T p values for only one well.

b

C T/T p values for only two wells. Undet. C T value undetermined by rRT‐PCR.