Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 11;92(1093):20180153. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180153

Table 2.

Diagnostic performance of texture features in predicting stage of liver fibrosis

Texture parameter Fibrosis stage Threshold Sensitivity Specificity AUC Lower CI Upper CI
Mean (ssf 3) F0 vs F1-F4 0.3 0.78 0.73 0.81 0.77 0.85
F0-1 vs F2-4 0.44 0.74 0.75 0.80 0.76 0.83
F0-2 vs F3-4 0.54 0.78 0.73 0.82 0.79 0.86
F0-3 vs F4 0.9 0.75 0.81 0.85 0.82 0.88
Mpp F0 vs F1-F4 98.4 0.3 0.9 0.58 053 0.63
F0-1 vs F2-4 100.3 0.35 0.87 0.62 0.58 0.67
F0-2 vs F3-4 107.2 0.55 0.76 0.67 0.63 0.72
F0-3 vs F4 106.4 0.54 0.71 0.63 0.58 0.68
Skewness F0 vs F1-F4 1.5 0.64 0.71 0.69 0.64 0.74
F0-1 vs F2-4 1.6 0.74 0.66 0.73 0.68 0.77
F0-2 vs F3-4 1.4 0.76 0.68 0.76 0.71 0.80
F0-3 vs F4 1.4 0.85 0.63 0.78 0.75 0.82
Kurtosis F0 vs F1-F4 4.5 0.4 0.87 0.61 0.56 0.65
F0-1 vs F2-4 5.7 0.54 0.79 0.65 0.60 0.69
F0-2 vs F3-4 4.6 0.51 0.82 0.66 0.61 0.70
F0-3 vs F4 4.6 0.61 0.79 0.71 0.66 0.76

AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval;

All measurements were performed in the portal venous phase in segments IV-VIII. Mean at spatial scaling factor 3 (medium filter), mpp at ssf 0, skewness and kurtosis at ssf 6 (coarse filter).