Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 2;92(1093):20180101. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180101

Table 3.

Tumour visibility on DBT + FFDM and Imaging variables: Univariate analysis

Imaging variables Total (n = 106) Tumour visibility on DBT + FFDM
1 (n = 22) 2 (n = 11) 3 (n = 73) P-value a
Breast composition
 a 22 (20.8) 0 (0) 1 (9.1) 21 (28.8) <0.001
 b 18 (17.0) 0 (0) 1 (9.1) 17 (23.3)
 c 44 (41.5) 5 (22.7) 9 (81.8) 30 (41.1)
 d 22 (20.8) 17 (77.3) 0 (0) 5 (6.8)
Breast thickness (mm) b
 Mean ± SD 45.8 ± 11.0 (range 11.0–67.8) 41.2 ± 11.6 51.2 ± 9.2 46.4 ± 10.7 0.211
Mass shape
 Oval or round 24 (22.6) 2 (9.1) 3 (27.3) 19 (26.0) 0.232
 Irregular 82 (77.4) 20 (90.9) 8 (72.7) 54 (74.0)
Mass margin
 Circumscribed 5 (4.7) 0 (0) 2 (18.2) 3 (4.1) 0.061
 Not-circumscribed 101 (95.3) 22 (100) 9 (81.9) 70 (95.9)
Mass density
 Iso 37 (34.9) 14 (63.6) 3 (27.3) 20 (27.4) 0.006
 Hyper 69 (65.1) 8 (36.4) 8 (72.7) 53 (72.6)

DBT, digital breast tomosynthesis; FFDM, full-field digital mammography; SD, standard deviation.

Data are numbers of cases, and data in parentheses are percentages.

a

P-values were obtained by the Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. P-value < 0.050 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

b

Automatically measured at the time of mammographic image acquisition.