Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 28;92(1093):20180691. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180691

Table 4.

Normalized confusion matrix for the “real-world” dataset with the consensus decision of the two readers as ground truth, applying the four classes of the ACR density definition

Reference:consensus decision PREDICTED
RMLO projections RCC projections
ACR A ACR B ACR C ACR D ACR A ACR B ACR C ACR D

GROUND TRUTH
ACR A 73.7(89.5%)[89.5%] 26.3(10.5%)[10.5%] 0.0%(0.0%)[0.0%] 0.0%(0.0%)[0.0%] 79.0%(100.0%) [94.7% ] 21.1%(0.0%)[5.3%] 0.0%(0.0%)[0.0%] 0.0%(0.0%)[0.0%]
ACR B 0.0%(18.2%)[9.1%] 93.9%(66.7%)[87.9%] 6.1%(15.2%)[3.0%] 0.0%(0.0%)[0.0%] 0.0% (6.9%) [20.7%] 93.1%(93.1%)[79.3%] 6.9%(0.0%)[0.0%] 0.0%(0.0%)[0.0%]
ACR C 0.0%(0.0%)[0.0%] 16.0%(8.0%)[0.0%] 80.0%(84.0%)[100.0%] 4.0%(8.0%)[0.0%] 0.0% (0.0%) [0.0%] 8.1%(5.4%)[2.7%] 83.8%(94.6%)[75.7%] 8.1%(0.0%)[21.6%]
ACR D 0.0%(0.0%)[0.0%] 0.0%(0.0%)[0.0%] 8.7%(26.1%)[8.7%] 91.3%(73.9%)[91.3%] 0.0% (0.0%) [0.0%] 0.0%(0.0%)[0.0%] 6.7%(46.7%)[0.0%] 93.3%(53.3%)[100.0%]

ACR, American College of Radiology ; dCNN, deep convolutional neural network;RCC, right craniocaudal;

Reader 1, no brackets; Reader 2, round brackets ( ); the dCNN, square brackets [ ].