Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 26;14(3):e0209532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209532

Table 1. Literature review of economic growth and CO2 emission.

Study Datasets Econometric techniques Period Outcomes
[28] 12 Western European countries linear cointegration model 1861–2015 Elasticity of income of CO2 emission in all countries.
The cointegration method of CO2 emission and GDP of countries.
The study important for developing countries.
[29] Tunisian Vector Autoregressive (VAR) model. 1980–2014 Determined the influence factor of CO2 emission.
Explored, the EKC with inverted U-shaped pattern in CO2 emission.
[30] 21 industrial countries Unit root test 1960–1997 The test result was consistent with narrow and wide application in different industrial countries.
[31] 21 OECD countries Univariate unit root tests 1950–2014 The per capita CO2 emission is less explosive at each quantile without smooth break in 21 OECD Countries.
[32] Pakistan ARDL approach 2014 Dynamic causality between energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emission.
[33] South African ARDL approach, Engel Granger method. 1960–2009 Per capita has significant long positively effect in level of CO2.
Find bidirectional causality between in income per capita and foreign trade.
[34] 116 Countries Panel vector autoregressive (PVAR), Generalized method of moment (GMM) 1990–2014 Energy consumption does not cause of regional level, Economic growth has negative casual impact on carbon emission, energy consumption positively causes of economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa.
[35] 28 subsectors Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) 2002–2015 FDI is positive predictor of environmental quality and reduce CO2 emission level.
[23] 42 developing countries Granger causality modeling, error correction model (ECM), Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) 2002–2011 In long the energy consumption positively contribute to economic growth.
[36] India, Indonesia, China and Brazil Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) 1970–2012 EKC finding that Brazil, China and Indonesia impact on income and reduce their CO2 emission.
[37] 24 sub-Saharan African countries Panel cointegration 1980–2010 Inverted U-Shaped EKC is not supported for these countries in long-run estimation; export have a positive and import have a negative impact on CO2 emission.
[38] China and India ARDL 1965–2013 EKC result supported by long-run positive impact on emission
20 countries in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Regression 1980–2014 EKC impact by regression on population, affluence and technology framework.
[19] 5 economies of South Asia FMOLS 1971–2013 Consumption of energy and population density will increase in long run.
[39] 14 Asian countries GMM 1990–2011 To support EKC by emissions and income per capita and results are statistically significant.
Middle East, North Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa DOLS and VEC 1980–2010 The results of EKC indicate significance of renewable energy consumption.
[40] 25 OECD countries FMOLS 1980–2010 EKC verified that non-renewable energy CO2 emissions renewable.

Sources: Authors’ compiling by the literature review