Table 2.
LVO Screening methods |
Probability of LVO |
Ideal time metrics | Real-world time metrics | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scene to PSC arrival time (min)* |
Additional transport time to CSC (min) |
Scene to PSC arrival time (min)* |
Additional transport time to CSC (min) |
||
LVO prevalence = 0.0487 | |||||
Screened Negative29† | 0.02 | <60 | <1 | <40 | <23 |
>100 | <2 | >70 | <28 | ||
No Screening18 | 0.0487 | <60 | <2 | <40 | <28 |
>100 | <5 | >70 | <39 | ||
Screened Positive‡ | |||||
High sensitivity/ Low specificity30 |
0.07 | <60 | <3 | <40 | <32 |
>100 | <8 | >70 | <46 | ||
Moderate sensitivity/ Moderate specificity29 |
0.18 | <60 | <9 | <20 | <50 |
>100 | <18 | >70 | <83 | ||
Low sensitivity/ High specificity31 |
0.23 | <60 | <11 | <20 | <59 |
>100 | <23 | >70 | <99 | ||
LVO prevalence = 0.118 | |||||
Screened Negative29† | 0.06 | <60 | <3 | <40 | <30 |
>100 | <7 | >70 | <43 | ||
No Screening2 | 0.118 | <60 | <6 | <40 | <40 |
>100 | <12 | >70 | <63 | ||
Screened Positive‡ | |||||
High sensitivity/ Low specificity30 |
0.16 | <60 | <8 | <40 | <47 |
>100 | <16 | >70 | <77 | ||
Moderate sensitivity/ Moderate specificity29 |
0.36 | <60 | <18 | <20 | <103 |
>100 | <33 | >70 | <135 | ||
Low sensitivity/ High specificity31 |
0.45 | <60 | <23 | <20 | <130 |
>100 | <39 | >70 | <158 |
LVO, Large vessel occlusion; PSC, primary stroke center; CSC, comprehensive stroke center.
The dichotomized time ranges presented for scene to PSC arrival time were generated from both individual sensitivity analyses and visual inspection of the two-way sensitivity analysis figures.
Probability of LVO calculated from using a single scale with moderate sensitivity (0.63), moderate specificity (0.85).
We calculated positive predictive values across the full range of reported sensitivity/specificity, and chose to present 3 representative combinations: 1. high sensitivity (0.83), low specificity (0.40), and positive likelihood ratio (1.8); 2. moderate sensitivity (0.63), moderate specificity (0.85), and positive likelihood ratio (4.3); and 3. low sensitivity (0.30), high specificity (0.95), and positive likelihood ratio (6.0).