Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mindfulness (N Y). 2018 Sep 5;10(4):724–736. doi: 10.1007/s12671-018-1023-z

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for Mindfulness and Craving Scores by Treatment Group across Studies.

Study 1 Study 2
Measure TAU
Mean(SD)
MBRP
Mean(SD)
d TAU
Mean(SD)
MBRP
Mean(SD)
d

AAQ
Baseline 3.93(0.80) 3.92(0.62) 0.01 3.86(0.74) 3.99(0.54) −0.20
Post-treatment 3.97(0.84) 4.27(0.65) −0.40 4.04(0.76) 4.00(0.65) 0.06
FFMQ Act awareness
Baseline 3.46(0.86) 3.27(0.78) 0.24 3.36(0.84) 3.46(0.75) −0.13
Post-treatment 3.31(0.90) 3.39(0.87) −0.08 3.47(0.77) 3.42(0.70) 0.07
FFMQ Nonjudgment
Baseline 3.37(0.83) 3.21(0.78) 0.20 3.67(0.84) 3.80(0.85) −0.15
Post-treatment 3.17(0.77) 3.54(0.86) −0.46 3.43(0.83) 3.41(0.79) 0.03
PACS
Baseline 1.73 (1.42) 1.55 (1.13) 0.14 1.62(1.32) 1.23 (0.91) 0.34
Post-treatment 1.70 (1.42) 1.12 (1.05) 0.46 1.33 (1.26) 1.10 (1.05) 0.21
2-month follow-up 1.42 (1.49) 0.98 (0.98) 0.35 0.94 (1.07) 1.13 (1.12) −0.18
4-month follow-up 1.28 (1.50) 1.09 (1.26) 0.14 1.02 (0.98) 0.87 (0.85) 0.16

Note. MBRP = mindfulness based relapse prevention; d = Cohen’s d measure of effect size calculated at each time point using the formula d=x1x2SDpool where SDpool=(SD12+SD12)/22