Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 17.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosci Lett. 2018 Dec 29;698:140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.12.043

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A) Estimated marginal means MMF latencies by group, hemisphere and token. Error bars represent one standard error of the marginal means. There is a significant (asterisk: p<0.05) main effect of group on MMF latency, indicating ASD showed significantly delayed MMF latency across both hemispheres and tokens (p<0.05). There were no main effects of hemisphere or token.

(B) Estimated marginal means of MMF amplitude by group and token. Error bars represent one standard error of the marginal means. Although MMF amplitude appears to tend to be greater in ASD compared to TD, there are in fact no statistically significant main effects of group, hemisphere or token.

(C) Estimated marginal mean M100 latencies by group, hemisphere and token. Error bars represent one standard error of the marginal means. There are significant main effects of group and hemisphere on M100 latency, indicating ASD showed significantly delayed M100 latency across hemispheres and tokens (p<0.05) as well as that, in general, for either group, right hemisphere responses were slightly later than left hemisphere responses in this study.

(D) Grouped scatter plot of MMF latencies vs M100 latencies, depicting no significant association within either TD or ASD groups across hemispheres and tokens (p<0.05). While both M100 and MMF latencies are in general delayed in ASD compared to TD, these delays appear to be decoupled from each other.