Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2019 Jan 17;81(6):3515–3529. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27662

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Comparison of ordinary and nested shift undersampling for 4-fold SUPER-SENSE. Two coils were simulated, each with a step-function profile. With ordinary shift undersampling (top), each voxel has a unique modulation frequency. With nested shift undersampling (bottom), there is no frequency modulation between voxels half-FOV apart, but these voxels are measured by different coils. On the other hand, nested shift undersampling leads to a spectral difference twice as large as that with ordinary shift undersampling, between voxels ¼-FOV apart (double-headed arrows). This leads to reduced overlapping between these voxels compared to ordinary shift undersampling.