Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies about serum copper levels and cervical cancer risk.
Study, year | Country | Age (range or Mean ± SD) | Study type | Study quality scores | Cervical cancer cases | Controls | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Serum copper: mean ± SD | n | Serum copper: mean ± SD | |||||
Arumanayagam et al., 1993 [8] | China | 58.7± 1.83 | HBCC | 7 | 57 | 19.1 ± 0.55 (μmol/l) | 24 | 18.2 ± 0.75 (μmol/l) |
Cetinkaya et al., 1988 [9] | Turkey | NA | PBCC | 7 | 9 | 1.69 ± 0.6 (μg/ml | 20 | 0.44 ± 0.46 (μg/ml) |
Chen et al., 1990 [10] | China | 25–70 | HBCC | 7 | 99 | 117.1 ± 14.6 (μg/ml) | 50 | 109.4 ± 17.4 (μg/ml) |
Cunzhi et al., 2003 [11] | China | 30–65 | PBCC | 6 | 40 | 19 ± 7 (μmol/l) | 50 | 14 ± 4 (μmol/l) |
Fu et al., 2009 [12] | China | 31–70 | PBCC | 7 | 74 | 18.96 ± 3.25 (μmol/l) | 180 | 15.78 ± 3.88 (μmol/l) |
Grail et al., 1986 [13] | U.K. | 25–60 | PBCC | 8 | 24 | 1.47 ± 0.26 (mg/l) | 21 | 1.25 ± 0.16 (mg/l) |
Kim et al., 2003 [19] | Korea | 35–74 | HBCC | 7 | 36 | 101.6 ± 5.25 (μg/dl) | 44 | 101.5 ± 5.47 (μg/dl) |
Naidu et al., 2007 [14] | India | 25–65 | PBCC | 8 | 30 | 117.4 ± 12.26 (μg%) | 30 | 109.7 ± 10.85 (μg%) |
Ramteke et al., 2015 [15] | India | 35–75 | PBCC | 8 | 50 | 156.9 ± 3.4 (μg/dl) | 50 | 107.2 ± 1.79 (μg/dl) |
Subramanyam et al., 2013 [20] | India | 30–75 | PBCC | 7 | 104 | 78.15 ± 2.8 (μg/dl) | 50 | 98.76 ± 2.43 (μg/dl) |
Wang et al., 2010 [16] | China | 25–60 | PBCC | 7 | 41 | 14.23 ± 3.15 (μmol/l) | 260 | 12.73 ± 2.56 (μmol/l) |
Yu et al., 2016 [21] | China | 36–65 | PBCC | 7 | 70 | 12.39 ± 2.1 (μmol/l) | 150 | 48.74 ± 6.5 (μmol/l) |
Zhang et al., 1996 [17] | China | 32–61 | PBCC | 6 | 55 | 24.93 ± 6.05 (μmol/l) | 35 | 19.31 ± 2.46 (μmol/l) |
Zhang et al., 2015 [18] | China | 32–70 | PBCC | 7 | 58 | 50.9 ± 4.5 (μmol/l) | 50 | 10.3 ± 4 (μmol/l) |
Abbreviations: HBCC, hospital-based case–control study; PBCC, population-based case–control study.