Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 25;12:1756284819836620. doi: 10.1177/1756284819836620

Table 2.

Summary of studies assessing the enteric virome in IBD patients.

Study Year Patient cohort Age group Sample source Number of patients Number of controls Method Key findings
Lepage et al. 2008 CD Adult Colonic biopsies 19 14 Epifluorescence microscopy, transmission electron microscopy ↑Bacteriophages detected in the mucosa from CD patients than from healthy individuals
Wagner et al. 2013 CD Paediatric Ileal and colonic biopsies, gut wash samples 6, 3 8 Viral metagenome – 454 pyrosequencing Roche GS-FLX Titanium Differences in bacteriophage composition between CD patients and control individuals
Pérez-Brocal et al. 2013 CD Adult Faeces, ileum tissue 11, 1 6 Viral metagenome – 454 pyrosequencing Roche GS- FLX titanium plus ↓ Diversity of viral and bacterial communities in CD samples compared with the control group ↑ Variability between the CD samples in both virome and microbiome
Wang et al. 2015 CD + UC Adult Colonic tissue (biopsy/surgery) 10 5 Viral metagenome – Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing platform ↑ Viral sequences in CD
Difference in abundance and diversity within the virome between CD and control group
Norman et al. 2015 CD + UC Adult Faeces UK Cohort (UC 21, CD 14) Chicago cohort (UC 17, CD 8) LA cohort (UC 22, CD 1) Boston cohort (UC 15, CD 20) UK Cohort (HC 22) Chicago cohort (HC 24) LA cohort (HC 0) Boston cohort (HC 10) Viral metagenome – Roche 454 (initial study) and Illumina MiSeq platform (in-depth analysis) ↑ Viral richness and Caudovirales expansion in CD and UC
↓ Decreased bacterial richness and diversity in UC and CD Inverse correlation of Caudovirales with prevalent bacterial taxa in CD

UC, ulcerative colitis; CD, Crohn’s disease; HC, Healthy controls.