TABLE 3.
Cox proportional hazards model of the primary composite endpoint
Parameter | Univariable HR (95% CI) | P-value | Multivariable HR (95% CI) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Subclinical Inflammation (vs NOMOA) | 4.13 (1.96, 8.72) | <.001 | 2.89 (1.27, 6.57) | .01 |
DSA during year-1 posttransplant (vs no DSA) | 3.87 (1.60, 9.35) | .003 | 3.14 (1.17, 8.39) | .02 |
Total HLA mismatch (per no. out of 10 possible) | 1.18 (0.83, 1.68) | .37 | ||
Nonadherence <6 mo posttransplant (yes vs no) | 2.04 (0.87, 4.77) | .10 | 2.34 (0.93, 5.89) | .07 |
Age at transplant (per year) | 1.01 (0.94, 1.08) | .85 | ||
Cold ischemia time (per hour) | 1.00 (0.99, 1.00) | .66 | ||
Black race (vs nonblack race) | 2.43 (1.16, 5.10) | .02 | 1.88 (0.72, 4.90) | .20 |
Deceased donor (vs living donor) | 2.56 (0.98, 6.70) | .06 | 0.75 (0.18, 3.11) | .69 |
Male sex (vs female sex) | 0.78 (0.37, 1.64) | .52 |
The primary exposure was subclinical inflammation, defined as either borderline or subclinical T cell–mediated rejection. Covariates that were significantly associated with the primary endpoint at P < .10 by univariable analysis were entered into a multivariable model using forced entry. The final model was significant at P < .001, df = 6, χ2 = 29.59.
CI, confidence interval; DSA, donor-specific antibodies; HR, hazard ratio; NOMOA, no major abnormalities.