Table 7.
dDDH values obtained by comparison of all studied genomes using GGDC, Formula 2 (DDH Estimates Based on Identities/HSP length)a
| P. vaginalis strain KhD‐2T | P. raoultii strain KHD4T | P. pacaensis strain Kh‐D5T | P. urini‐massiliensis | P. harei | P. lacrimalis | P. duerdenii | P. indolicus | P. coxii | P. asaccharolyticus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. vaginalis | 100 ± 00 | 22.9 ± 2.35 | 40.0 ± 2.50 | 35.3 ± 2.50 | 45.8 ± 2.60 | 25.6 ± 2.40 | 32.0 ± 2.45 | 22.7 ± 2.40 | 47.3 ± 2.55 | 33.20 ± 2.45 |
| P. raoultii | 100 ± 00 | 29.8 ± 2.45 | 40.5 ± 2.50 | 19.0 ± 2.25 | 20.4 ± 2.30 | 36.4 ± 2.55 | 22.2 ± 2.35 | 44.3 ± 2.55 | 28.40 ± 2.45 | |
| P. pacaensis | 100 ± 00 | 45.0 ± 2.60 | 42.0 ± 2.55 | 41.9 ± 2.55 | 38.7 ± 2.50 | 27.3 ± 2.45 | 20.7 ± 2.35 | 29.30 ± 2.45 | ||
| P. urinimassiliensis | 100 ± 00 | 32.9 ± 2.50 | 56.4 ± 2.75 | 42.9 ± 2.50 | 33.0 ± 2.45 | 20.1 ± 2.30 | 32.30 ± 2.45 | |||
| P. harei | 100 ± 00 | 34.3 ± 2.50 | 39.2 ± 2.50 | 20.1 ± 2.30 | 36.2 ± 2.45 | 33.30 ± 2.45 | ||||
| P. lacrimalis | 100 ± 00 | 39.3 ± 2.50 | 25.1 ± 2.40 | 40.6 ± 2.50 | 31.90 ± 2.45 | |||||
| P. duerdenii | 100 ± 00 | 24.3 ± 2.35 | 38.2 ± 2.50 | 32.80 ± 2.50 | ||||||
| P. indolicus | 100 ± 00 | 44.0 ± 2.55 | 26.70 ± 2.45 | |||||||
| P. coxii | 100 ± 00 | 35.40 ± 2.45 | ||||||||
| P. asaccharolyticus | 100 ± 00 |
a
The confidence intervals indicate the inherent uncertainty in estimating DDH values from intergenomic distances based on models derived from empirical test data sets (which are always limited in size).