Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 27;14(3):e0207975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207975

Table 1. Summary of literature reporting SF MHC FT% from the VL in young speed, power, or strength-trained individuals.

Reference Subjects Condition MHC Distribution (%)
I I/IIa IIa IIa/IIx IIx I/IIa/IIx
Andersen (1994) Sprinting; 6M (23y) Post 12-week RE & Interval Training 41 1 52 5 0 0
Andersen (1994) Soccer; 8M (23y) National Players Post 12-week RE Training 59 3 30 9 0 <1
Williamson (2001) Non Ath;
6M (25y) 6F (21 y)
Post 12-week RE Training 30 35 5 3 59 52 5 12 0 0 0 0
Parcell (2003) Track & Field; 6F (23y) Division I / Interntional—Caliber 57 9 16 14 1 1
Raue (2005) Non Ath; 6M (24y) 6M (24y) Post-Con RE Post-Ecc RE 38 25 1 7 34 39 27 25 0 2 <1 <1
Parcell (2005) Non Ath; 10M (22y) Post 8-week Sprint Cycle Training 34 8 44 12 0 2
Malisoux (2006) Non Ath; 8M (23) Post 8-week Plyometric Training 28 5 42 26 2 0
Kesidis (2008) Bodybuilding; 8M (26 y) National-Caliber 35 19 39 7 0 0
Trappe (2015) Sprinting; 1M (? y) Previously World Champion 24 5 34 9 24 0
Murach (2016) Non Ath; 9M (25y) Resistance Trained 17 10 60 11 <1 <1
Bagley (2017) Non Ath; 15M (25y) Resistance Trained 20 10 58 11 1 1
Arevalo (2017) Non Ath; 13M (24y) Resistance Trained 28 9 60 3 <1 <1
Tobias (2017) Non Ath; 1F (32y) Concurrently Trained 45 13 31 9 0 2

M = Male; F = Female; y = Year; RE = Resistance exercise; Non Ath = Not a competitive athlete; Track & Field = athletes from a combination of pole vault, heptathlon, 100 and 400 m hurdles, and long jump events; Con = Concentric, Ecc = Eccentric; Concurrently Trained = combined endurance and resistance training