Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 20.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2018 Dec 12;565(7737):112–117. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0781-z

Extended Data Fig. 7. Expression and substrate conjugation to Vlm TE containing DAP at position 2,463.

Extended Data Fig. 7

a, Following expression and purification of Vlm TEDAP, the protein was loaded on an SDS–PAGE gel and Coomassie stained; the experiment was repeated in two biological replicates with similar results. b, The deprotection of 6 in TEDAP–strep was followed by ESI–MS analysis. Green trace, purified TEDAP–strep containing 6 at position 2,463: expected mass 32,364.6 Da, observed 32,365.78 Da. Red trace, TEDAP–strep containing 6 at position 2,463 following illumination to convert 6 to the intermediate: expected 32,171.56 Da, observed 32,168.48 Da; and further incubation (1 h, 4 °C) to convert the intermediate to product: expected 32,067.62 Da, observed 32,068 Da). Blue trace, TEDAP–strep containing 6 at position 2,463 following illumination (to convert 6 to the intermediate) and further incubation (10 h, 4 °C) to convert the intermediate to DAP (1): expected 32,067.62 Da; observed, 32,067.84 Da. The experiment was repeated in two biological replicates with similar results. c, Purified TEDAP after illumination and intermediate fragmentation: expected 31,027.24 Da, observed 31,026.95 Da and 31,131.82 Da. d, TEDAP incubated with tetradepsipeptidyl–SNAC 7: expected 31,027.24 Da (unmodified) and 31,398.69 Da (modified); observed 31,025.92 Da and 31,396.55 Da. The experiments in panels c, d were repeated independently two times with similar results.