Table 3. Loss to follow-up (LTFU) of study participants from baseline to endline.
Characteristic | Total | Lost | Crude Odds Ratio of being LTFU (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|
Overall | 860 | 186 (21.6%) | |
Setting | |||
Urban | 412 | 99 (24.0%) | Baseline |
Rural | 448 | 87 (19.4%) | 0.76 (0.55, 1.05) |
Sex | |||
Male | 437 | 83 (19.0%) | Baseline |
Female | 423 | 103 (24.3%) | 1.37 (0.99, 1.90) |
Age group | |||
18–24 | 316 | 88 (27.8%) | Baseline |
25–34 | 311 | 64 (20.6%) | 0.67 (0.46, 0.97) |
35+ | 233 | 34 (14.6%) | 0.44 (0.29, 0.69) |
Away for > one month in a year | |||
Yes | 189 | 52 (27.5%) | Baseline |
No | 662 | 132 (19.9%) | 0.66 (0.45, 0.95) |
Time lived in community | |||
Less than a year | 117 | 47 (40.2%) | Baseline |
More than a year | 743 | 139 (18.7%) | 0.34 (0.23, 0.52) |
Education | |||
Pre-primary school | 87 | 17 (19.5%) | 0.84 (0.47, 1.51) |
Primary school | 366 | 82 (22.4%) | Baseline |
Secondary school | 183 | 49 (26.8%) | 1.27 (0.84, 1.91) |
Higher or above | 42 | 9 (21.4%) | 0.94 (0.43, 2.05) |
Fishing industry | |||
No | 551 | 130 (23.6%) | Baseline |
Yes | 309 | 56 (18.1%) | 0.72 (0.51, 1.02) |
Farmer | |||
No | 639 | 149 (23.3%) | Baseline |
Yes | 221 | 37 (16.7%) | 0.66 (0.44, 0.98) |
Hotel /restaurant/bar | |||
No | 782 | 159 (20.3%) | Baseline |
Yes | 78 | 27 (34.6%) | 2.07 (1.26, 3.41) |
Currently married | |||
No | 162 | 41 (25.3%) | Baseline |
Yes | 698 | 145 (20.8%) | 0.77 (0.52, 1.15) |
HIV status | |||
Negative | 722 | 143 (19.8%) | Baseline |
Positive | 138 | 43 (31.2%) | 1.83 (1.22, 2.75) |
No partners in last 3 months | |||
At least one | 687 | 144 (21.0%) | Baseline |
None | 77 | 16 (20.8%) | 0.99 (0.55, 1.77) |
Male circumcised | |||
No | 214 | 45 (21.0%) | Baseline |
Yes | 191 | 38 (19.9%) | 0.93 (0.57, 1.51) |
Study arm | |||
Control | 418 | 88 (21.1%) | Baseline |
Intervention | 442 | 98 (22.2%) | 1.07 (0.77, 1.48) |