Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2018 Feb 10;66:12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.02.003

Table 3.

Brain activation differences for SST “saliency” contrast analysis (i.e., stop > go trials) between groups, including paired t-test comparison of participants with PD in their “ON” versus “OFF” medication state (Medication effects) and 2-sample t-test comparison of participants with Parkinson’s disease in their “OFF” medication state versus controls (disease effects)

Contrast Cluster size (mm3) p-value (FWE corrected) t-score MNI coordinates (mm)
Identified regions
X Y Z
ON > OFF (medication effect)
 Stop > Go 5828 0.044 6.47 20 0 −12 R striatum, R thalamus, R insula, R IFG
6.08 16 −12 10
5.19 16 −27 8
CTL > OFF (disease effect)
 Stop > Go 6764 0.039 5.07 23 3 −18 R striatum
4.69 23 8 −22
4.55 13 10 0

Task contrast results have a cluster-forming threshold of p < 0.005, with a nonparametric p < 0.05 FWE cluster correction, using SnPM13.

Key: CTL, control; FWE, family-wise error; IFG, inferior frontal junction; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; R, right.