Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Black Sex Relatsh. 2018 Winter;4(3):10.1353/bsr.2018.0001. doi: 10.1353/bsr.2018.0001

Table 2.

Sociodemographic characteristics of participants by risk group, New York City, 2009

Variable Total %
(n=56)
Risk Group
p-value
High Risk % (n=36) Low Risk %
32.9 33.8 31.4
Age, year (SD) (7.90) (6.90) (9.81) 0.42
Heterosexual (self-described) 96 100 88 0.09
Born in the USA 98 97 100 1.00
Education (≤ HS/GED) 75 74 76 1.00
Income (≤ $10,000 annually) 66 69 59 0.54
Employment status 62 60 67 0.61
(unemployed)
Public Assistance 6l 64 53 0.55
Incarceration (lifetime) 86 92 71 0.05
Incarceration (past year) 69 72 58 0.37
Have child(ren) 66 69 59 0.54
Primary Female Partner, p3m 71 67 81 0.34
4.61 5.28 3.06
Female Sex Partners, p3m (6.0) (6.87) (2.86) 0.03
(mean, SD) 2.60 3.06 1.38
Female Sex Partners, no (2.82) (3.17) (0.65) 0.00
condom use (mean, SD)
At least one episode of vaginal/anal sex, no condom use 87 90 80 0.40
HIV Test, ever 98 97 100 1.00
HIV Test, past year 82 82 82 1.00
Discussed his HIV status with some/all partners* 78 74 100 0.54
Discussed his partners’ HIV status(es) with some/all partners** 69 64 81 0.34
*

n=27 due to missing data;

**

n=55 due to missing data