Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 27.
Published before final editing as: J Res Adolesc. 2018 Sep 27:10.1111/jora.12456. doi: 10.1111/jora.12456

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics for Key Variables

Mean Standard Deviation
GSA Functions
(Range: 1=not at all, to 5=a lot)
 Information Received 3.68 1.05
 Information Desired 3.95 1.14
 Socializing/Support Received 4.46 0.67
 Socializing/Support Desired 4.13 1.17
 Advocacy Received 3.12 0.96
 Advocacy Desired 4.20 0.99
Positive Youth Competencies
 Self-Reflection (Range: 1=Strongly disagree to 6=Strongly agree) 4.43 1.27
 Bravery (Range: 1=Very inaccurate to 5=Very accurate) 3.46 0.96
 Civic Engagement (Range: 1=Strongly disagree to 5=Strongly agree) 2.97 1.03
 Agency (Range: 1=Definitely false to 8=Definitely true) 5.04 1.69
Victimization (Range 0=0 times in past mo. to 4=7+ times in past mo.) 0.54 0.72
Membership Duration (Years) 1.56 1.22
Demographics n %
Grade Level
 8th 3 1.0
 9th 46 16.1
 10th 88 30.8
 11th 94 32.9
 12th 55 19.2
Racial/Ethnic Minority Identity 90 31.4
Sexual Orientation
 Heterosexual 87 29.5
 Lesbian/Gay 73 24.7
 Bisexual 59 20.0
 Questioning 18 6.1
 Other Identity 55 18.6
Sex and Gender Identity
 Cisgender Female 200 67.8
 Cisgender Male 66 22.4
 Transgender MTF 1 0.3
 Transgender FTM 10 3.4
 Genderqueer, or other identity 16 5.5
Structural Indicators
Students Eligible for Free Lunch at School 31.2
Urbanicity
 Urban 24 8.3
 Suburban 249 85.9
 Rural 17 5.9
Liberal Voting Pattern 53.5
Same-Gender Households (Density per 1000) 8.08 3.66

Note. Descriptive statistics are reported for participant demographics, victimization experiences, and Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA) functions received and desired, and positive developmental competencies. Analysis sample n=290. Structural indicators: Urbanicity was coded at the level of the school and assigned to each student. Proportion students eligible for free lunch is reported at the level of the school and represents the overall average across schools in the sample. Liberal voting pattern represents percentages voting democrat in the 2014 Massachusetts gubernatorial election within the voting precinct of the school. Same-gender households represents the density per 1000 adults in same-gender households in the county of the school. More details can be found in the Method.