Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan-Feb;26(1):56–60. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000641

Table 3:

Mean differencesa (95% confidence intervals) in levator hiatus area, genital hiatus, and strength outcomes.

Group Hiatus area at max Valsalva (cm2) Genital hiatus (GH) with strain (cm) Change in hiatus area with contraction (cm2) peak pressure (cmH2O)b
Neither levator ani avulsion nor Forceps (n=355) Ref Ref Ref ref
Only Forceps delivery (n=32) −0.7
(−4.1, 2.6)
−0.3
(−0.6, 0.1)
−0.3
(−1.5, 0.9)
−2.7
(−8.9, 3.5)
Only Levator ani avulsion (n=36) 7.3
(4.1, 10.4)
0.6
(0.3, 0.9)
−0.6
(−1.7, 0.6)
−14.5
(−20.4, −8.7)
Levator ani avulsion and forceps delivery (n=30) 11.4
(7.9, 14.9)
0.7
(0.4, 1.1)
−0.6
(−1.9, 0.6)
−17.0
(−23.4, −10.6)
a

Mean differences correspond to beta coefficients (increase or decrease for each measurement) derived from multivariable linear regression, adjusted for age, race, macrosomia, and prolonged second stage of labor. Statistically significant results are shown in bold font.