Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 21;10:164. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00164

Table 1.

Main characteristics of the eight studies included.

Study Region Mean age or age range of participants (years) TM group n (%) Confirmation of cancer diagnosis after US Bilateral testicular volume (mean ± SD) Cryptorchidism history (%) in TM group Bilateral TM (%) Semen abnormalities
Aizenstein et al. (2) USA 37 5 (2.8) NA NR 40 50 All participants had oligo and/ or astheno
La Vignera et al. (26) Italy 43.3 60 (18.8) Histology NR NR NR Oligo/astheno and/or terato in 66.6% of the TM group
Mazzilli et al. (27) Italy NA 13 (4.6) NA Whole population: 18.0 ± 4.5 ml NR NR In the whole study population: oligo: 23.8% azo: 5.6% astheno: 70.4% terato: 20.3%
Negri et al. (25) Italy 37 31 (1.4) Histology NR 13 NR NS
Pierik et al. (23) NL 20–58 12 (0.9) Histology NR 33.3 NR NS
Qublan et al. (28) Jordan 31 23 (9.8) NA Whole population: 14.0 ± 3.6 ml NR NR All participants had oligo or azo
Sakamoto et al. (24) Japan 35.8 31 (5.6) Histology TM group: 9.0 ± 5.2 ml Controls: 9.8 ± 5.1 ml 3.2 90.3 Oligo or azo in 64.5% of whole study population
Thomas et al. (7) UK 29–51 5 (3.1) NA NR 0 0 NS

Astheno, asthenozoospermia; Azo, azoospermia; Oligo, oligozoospermia; Terato, teratozoospermia; TM, testicular microlithiasis; NA, not applicable (no testicular masses were detected at US); NL, Netherlands; NR, not reported; NS, not specified; SD, standard deviation; US, ultrasonography.